Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20633242›Full record

ReviewTraffic (Copenhagen, Denmark)2010

Clathrin-mediated endocytosis at the synaptic terminal: bridging the gap between physiology and molecules.

Stephen J Royle, Leon Lagnado

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Traffic (Copenhagen, Denmark), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Phosphatidic acid and neurotransmission.Advances in biological regulation · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Role of PICALM in Alzheimer's Disease.Molecular neurobiology · 2015
    Review
  16. Modes and regulation of endocytic membrane retrieval in mouse auditory hair cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen J RoylePhysiological Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK. s.j.royle@liverpool.ac.uk
Leon Lagnado
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105178794Wellcome Trust 084569
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has long been known that the maintenance of fast communication between neurons requires that presynaptic terminals recycle the small vesicles from which neurotransmitter is released. But the mechanisms that retrieve vesicles from the cell surface are still not understood. Although we have a wealth of information about the molecular details of endocytosis in non-neuronal cells, it is clear that endocytosis at the synapse is faster and regulated in distinct ways. A satisfying understanding of these processes will require molecular events to be manipulated while observing endocytosis in living synapses. Here, we review recent work that seeks to bridge the gap between physiology and molecules to unravel the endocytic machinery operating at the synaptic terminal.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Vesicular TransportAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsClathrinClathrin-Coated VesiclesDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEndocytosisMicePresynaptic TerminalsRatsSynaptic VesiclesAdaptor Proteins, Vesicular TransportCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsClathrinDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20633242
PMCPMC3371399
OpenAlexW2129142740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.