Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20632737›Full record

ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2010

Evaluation of injury and fatality risk in rock and ice climbing.

Volker Schöffl, Audry Morrison, Ulrich Schwarz, Isabelle Schöffl, Thomas Küpper

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Musculoskeletal injuries in rock climbing: a scoping review.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Adventure Recreation in Blue Spaces and the Wellbeing of Young Polish Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  8. A Life Dedicated to Climbing and Its Sequelae in the Fingers-A Review of the Literature.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  9. Profiles of Wellbeing in Soft and Hard Mountain Hikers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Epidemiological Study of Foot Injuries in the Practice of Sport Climbing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Personal Resources of Winter and Summer Hikers Visiting the Tatra National Park, Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Rock Climbing Emergencies in the Austrian Alps: Injury Patterns, Risk Analysis and Preventive Measures.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Rock Climbing, Risk, and Recognition.Frontiers in psychology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Injuries in extreme sports.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Volker SchöfflDepartment of Sportorthopedics, Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Klinikum Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany. Volker.schoeffl@me.com
Audry Morrison
Ulrich Schwarz
Isabelle Schöffl
Thomas Küpper
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DERWTH Aachen University · DESozialstiftung Bamberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rock and ice climbing are widely considered to be 'high-risk' sporting activities that are associated with a high incidence of severe injury and even death, compared with more mainstream sports. However, objective scientific data to support this perception are questionable. Accordingly, >400 sport-specific injury studies were analysed and compared by quantifying the injury incidence and objectively grading the injury severity (using the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics score) per 1000 hours of sporting participation. Fatalities were also analysed. The analysis revealed that fatalities occurred in all sports, but it was not always clear whether the sport itself or pre-existing health conditions contributed or caused the deaths. Bouldering (ropeless climbing to low heights), sport climbing (mostly bolt protected lead climbing with little objective danger) and indoor climbing (climbing indoors on artificial rock structures), showed a small injury rate, minor injury severity and few fatalities. As more objective/external dangers exist for alpine and ice climbing, the injury rate, injury severity and fatality were all higher. Overall, climbing sports had a lower injury incidence and severity score than many popular sports, including basketball, sailing or soccer; indoor climbing ranked the lowest in terms of injuries of all sports assessed. Nevertheless, a fatality risk remains, especially in alpine and ice climbing. In the absence of a standard definition for a 'high-risk' sport, categorizing climbing as a high-risk sport was found to be either subjective or dependent on the definition used. In conclusion, this analysis showed that retrospective data on sport-specific injuries and fatalities are not reported in a standardized manner. To improve preventative injury measures for climbing sports, it is recommended that a standardized, robust and comprehensive sport-specific scoring model should be developed to report and fully evaluate the injury risk, severity of injuries and fatality risk in climbing sports.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesHumansIceMountaineeringRisk AssessmentRisk-TakingIce

Identifiers

PMID20632737
OpenAlexW1973423554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.