Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20631262›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2010

Discussing mentorship: An ongoing study for the development of a mentorship program in Saskatchewan.

Roanne Thomas-Maclean, Rita Hamoline, Elizabeth Quinlan, Vivian R Ramsden, Jennifer Kuzmicz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 79% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Mentorship in electrophysiology : What does it take? What's the advantage?]Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The Radiation Oncology Mentorship Initiative: Analysis of a Formal Mentoring Initiative for Medical Students Interested in Radiation Oncology.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  5. Quebec College of Family Physicians' new formal mentorship program.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2019
    Article
  6. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2019
    Article
  7. Enhancing Mentoring in Palliative Care: An Evidence Based Mentoring Framework.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roanne Thomas-MacleanDepartment of Sociology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon. roanne.thomas@usask.ca
Rita Hamoline
Elizabeth Quinlan
Vivian R Ramsden
Jennifer Kuzmicz
University of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify the essential components of a mentorship program as the first step in the ongoing development of a mentorship program for primary care physicians.

designMixed-methods study.

settingSaskatchewan.

participantsForty-nine of 170 physicians responded positively to a letter of invitation. Of these, 25 physicians were purposively sampled based on location, sex, and experience. Fourteen participants practised in urban areas and 11 in rural settings; 11 were men and 14 were women; and 10 were junior physicians and 15 were senior. Junior physicians were defined as those who had graduated from medical school after 1995, and senior physicians were those who had graduated before 1980.

methodsThis study employed qualitative, in-depth, semistructured interviews. Interview questions, based on an environmental scan, were developed then pilot-tested with a family physician. Interviews lasted approximately 60 minutes and were audiotaped. Digital audio files were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically. MAIN

findingsFamily physicians described positive and negative aspects of mentoring, or having a lack of experience with mentoring. They also outlined key components of a potential mentorship program: matching mentees with mentors; integrating formal and informal mentorship; and the evaluation process of the mentorship relationship and program.

conclusionBased on the feedback from family physicians, mentorship is viewed as an important and meaningful program of action that regional health stakeholders and medical educators in Saskatchewan could implement. A pilot test of a mentorship program model will be the culmination of this study. Further research will be undertaken to evaluate the model once it is implemented. This will have important implications for establishing a national mentorship program for family physicians across the country.

Indexed as

Family PracticeMentorsProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFeedbackFemaleHumansInterprofessional RelationsMalePilot ProjectsProfessional CompetenceQualitative ResearchRural PopulationSaskatchewan

Identifiers

PMID20631262
PMCPMC2922829
OpenAlexW2169336609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.