Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20631186›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2010

Efferent pathways modulate hyperactivity in inferior colliculus.

Wilhelmina Henrica A M Mulders, Kumar Seluakumaran, Donald Robertson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ginkgo biloba for tinnitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cognitive behavioural therapy for tinnitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Zinc supplementation for tinnitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Auditory Network Discoherence in Chronic Tinnitus.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Betahistine for tinnitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Review
  12. Objective assessment of subjective tinnitus through contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions by white noise: effects of frequency, gender, tinnitus bilaterality and age.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Neuromodulation (desynchronisation) for tinnitus in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Underlying mechanisms of tinnitus: review and clinical implications.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Wilhelmina Henrica A M MuldersThe Auditory Laboratory, Discipline of Physiology, School of Biomedical, Biomolecular, and Chemical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia. hmulders@cyllene.uwa.edu.au
Kumar Seluakumaran
Donald Robertson
University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

Action on Hearing Loss G37
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal models have demonstrated that mild hearing loss caused by acoustic trauma results in spontaneous hyperactivity in the central auditory pathways. This hyperactivity has been hypothesized to be involved in the generation of tinnitus, a phantom auditory sensation. We have recently shown that such hyperactivity, recorded in the inferior colliculus, is still dependent on cochlear neural output for some time after recovery (up to 6 weeks). We have now studied the capacity of an intrinsic efferent system, i.e., the olivocochlear system, to alter hyperactivity. This system is known to modulate cochlear neural output. Anesthetized guinea pigs were exposed to a loud sound and after 2 or 3 weeks of recovery, single-neuron recordings in inferior colliculus were made to confirm hyperactivity. Olivocochlear axons were electrically stimulated and effects on cochlear neural output and on highly spontaneous neurons in inferior colliculus were assessed. Olivocochlear stimulation suppressed spontaneous hyperactivity in the inferior colliculus. This result is in agreement with our earlier finding that hyperactivity can be modulated by altering cochlear neural output. Interestingly, the central suppression was generally much larger and longer lasting than reported previously for primary afferents. Blockade of the intracochlear effects of olivocochlear system activation eliminated some but not all of the effects observed on spontaneous activity, suggesting also a central component to the effects of stimulation. More research is needed to investigate whether these central effects of olivocochlear efferent stimulation are due to central intrinsic circuitry or to coactivation of central efferent collaterals to the cochlear nucleus.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PathwaysCochleaEfferent PathwaysElectrophysiologyFemaleGuinea PigsHearing Loss, Noise-InducedHyperkinesisInferior ColliculiMaleNeurons

Identifiers

PMID20631186
PMCPMC6632437
OpenAlexW2082378306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.