Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20631050›Full record

ArticleGenome research2010

Gene amplification as double minutes or homogeneously staining regions in solid tumors: origin and structure.

Clelia Tiziana Storlazzi, Angelo Lonoce, Maria C Guastadisegni, Domenico Trombetta, Pietro D'Addabbo, Giulia Daniele, Alberto L'Abbate, Gemma Macchia, Cecilia Surace, Klaas Kok and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 150 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 255 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Micronuclei: origins, assays, mechanisms, diseases and treatments.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Clinicopathological and genomic features of extrachromosomal DNA in gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Panorama of Chromosomal Instability in Lung Cancer.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Clelia Tiziana StorlazziDepartment of Genetics and Microbiology, University of Bari, Bari 70126, Italy.
Angelo Lonoce
Maria C Guastadisegni
Domenico Trombetta
Pietro D'Addabbo
Giulia Daniele
Alberto L'Abbate
Gemma Macchia
Cecilia Surace
Klaas Kok
Reinhard Ullmann
Stefania Purgato
Orazio Palumbo
Massimo Carella
Peter F Ambros
Mariano Rocchi
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITCasa Sollievo della Sofferenza · ITBoston Children's Hospital · USMax Planck Society · DEUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Double minutes (dmin) and homogeneously staining regions (hsr) are the cytogenetic hallmarks of genomic amplification in cancer. Different mechanisms have been proposed to explain their genesis. Recently, our group showed that the MYC-containing dmin in leukemia cases arise by excision and amplification (episome model). In the present paper we investigated 10 cell lines from solid tumors showing MYCN amplification as dmin or hsr. Particularly revealing results were provided by the two subclones of the neuroblastoma cell line STA-NB-10, one showing dmin-only and the second hsr-only amplification. Both subclones showed a deletion, at 2p24.3, whose extension matched the amplicon extension. Additionally, the amplicon structure of the dmin and hsr forms was identical. This strongly argues that the episome model, already demonstrated in leukemias, applies to solid tumors as well, and that dmin and hsr are two faces of the same coin. The organization of the duplicated segments varied from very simple (no apparent changes from the normal sequence) to very complex. MYCN was always overexpressed (significantly overexpressed in three cases). The fusion junctions, always mediated by nonhomologous end joining, occasionally juxtaposed truncated genes in the same transcriptional orientation. Fusion transcripts involving NBAS (also known as NAG), FAM49A, BC035112 (also known as NCRNA00276), and SMC6 genes were indeed detected, although their role in the context of the tumor is not clear.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationGenes, mycCytogeneticsIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypingMolecular Sequence DataNeoplasmsSequence Deletion

Identifiers

PMID20631050
PMCPMC2928498
OpenAlexW2097920585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.