Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20630854›Full record

ArticleScience translational medicine2010

The demographic and biomedical case for late-life interventions in aging.

Michael J Rae, Robert N Butler, Judith Campisi, Aubrey D N J de Grey, Caleb E Finch, Michael Gough, George M Martin, Jan Vijg, Kevin M Perrott, Barbara J Logan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science translational medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pharmacology of Aging:Aging biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Longevity Science and Women's Health and Wellbeing.Journal of population ageing · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael J RaeStrategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence (SENS) Foundation, Sunnyvale, CA 94089, USA.
Robert N Butler
Judith Campisi
Aubrey D N J de Grey
Caleb E Finch
Michael Gough
George M Martin
Jan Vijg
Kevin M Perrott
Barbara J Logan

Funding

INTERNATIONAL REGISTRY OF WERNER SYNDROME/CELL BANKR24CA078088 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MARTIN, GEORGE M. · 1997 to 2011
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R24 CA078088NCI NIH HHS R24CA078088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The social and medical costs of the biological aging process are high and will rise rapidly in coming decades, creating an enormous challenge to societies worldwide. In recent decades, researchers have expanded their understanding of the underlying deleterious structural and physiological changes (aging damage) that underlie the progressive functional impairments, declining health, and rising mortality of aging humans and other organisms and have been able to intervene in the process in model organisms, even late in life. To preempt a global aging crisis, we advocate an ambitious global initiative to translate these findings into interventions for aging humans, using three complementary approaches to retard, arrest, and even reverse aging damage, extending and even restoring the period of youthful health and functionality of older people.

Indexed as

DemographyAgedAgingHealth PolicyHumansLongevityPublic HealthRegenerative Medicine

Identifiers

PMID20630854
PMCPMC3677970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.