Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20630357›Full record

SynthesisJournal of midwifery & women's health

"Active labor" duration and dilation rates among low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset: a systematic review.

Jeremy L Neal, Nancy K Lowe, Karen L Ahijevych, Thelma E Patrick, Lori A Cabbage, Elizabeth J Corwin

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of midwifery & women's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Labor Pattern Among Primigravida in Local Population.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2018
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeremy L Neal
Nancy K Lowe
Karen L Ahijevych
Thelma E Patrick
Lori A Cabbage
Elizabeth J Corwin
The Ohio State University · USChildren's Hospital Colorado · USUniversity of Colorado Health · US

Funding

Maternal physiological factors influencing labor lengthF31NR010054 · NINR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI NEAL, JEREMY L · 2006 to 2008
$66k
NINR NIH HHS 1 F31 NR010054NINR NIH HHS F31 NR010054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLaboring women are often admitted to labor units under criteria that are commonly associated with the onset of active-phase labor (i.e., cervical dilatation of 3-5 cm in the presence of regular contractions). Beginning with these criteria through complete dilatation, this systematic review describes labor duration and cervical dilation rates among low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset.

methodsStudies published in English (between 1990 and 2008) were identified via MEDLINE and CINAHL searches. Data were abstracted and weighted "active labor" durations (i.e., from 3-5 cm through complete dilatation) and linear dilation rates were calculated.

resultsEighteen studies (n = 7009) reported mean "active labor" duration. The weighted mean duration was 6.0 hours, and the calculated dilation rate was 1.2 cm per hour. These findings closely parallel those found at the median. At the statistical limits, the weighted "active labor" duration was 13.4 hours (mean + 2 standard deviations) and the dilation rate was 0.6 cm per hour (mean - 2 standard deviations). DISCUSSION: These findings indicate that nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset have longer "active" labors and therefore slower dilation rates than are traditionally associated with active labor when commonly used criteria are applied as the starting point. Revision of existing active labor expectations and/or criteria used to prospectively identify active phase onset is warranted.

Indexed as

ParityCervix UteriFemaleHumansLabor, ObstetricLabor Stage, FirstParturitionPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRisk FactorsTime FactorsUterine Contraction

Identifiers

PMID20630357
PMCPMC2904982
OpenAlexW2044725382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.