Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20630053›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2010

An intervention to promote patient participation and self-management in long term conditions: development and feasibility testing.

Joanne Protheroe, Tom Blakeman, Peter Bower, Carolyn Chew-Graham, Anne Kennedy

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04090177 (Evaluation of a Peer-led eHealth Wheelchair Skills Training Program), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04090177 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of a Peer-led eHealth Wheelchair Skills Training Program: Training to Enhance Adaptation and Management for Wheelchair Users

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ManitobaRan2021 to 2024Enrolled54ConditionsMobility LimitationArmsTEAM Wheels
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Developing a patient safety guide for primary care: A co-design approach involving patients, carers and clinicians.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The development and initial validation of a clinical tool for patients' preferences on patient participation--The 4Ps.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Linking people with long-term health conditions to healthy community activities: development of Patient-Led Assessment for Network Support (PLANS).Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joanne ProtheroeNational Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M139PL, UK. j.protheroe@manchester.ac.uk
Tom Blakeman
Peter Bower
Carolyn Chew-Graham
Anne Kennedy

Funding

Department of Health RDA/01/05/009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is worldwide interest in managing the global burden of long-term conditions. Current health policy places emphasis on self-management and supporting patient participation as ways of improving patient outcomes and reducing costs. However, achieving genuine participation is difficult. This paper describes the development of an intervention designed to promote participation in the consultation and facilitate self-management in long-term conditions. In line with current guidance on the development of complex interventions, our aim was to develop and refine the initial intervention using qualitative methods, prior to more formal evaluation.

methodsWe based the intervention on published evidence on effective ways of improving participation. The intervention was developed, piloted and evaluated using a range of qualitative methods. Firstly, focus groups with stakeholders (5 patients and 3 clinicians) were held to introduce the prototype and elucidate how it could be improved. Then individual 'think aloud' and qualitative interviews (n = 10) were used to explore how patients responded to and understood the form and provide further refinement.

resultsThe literature highlighted that effective methods of increasing participation include the use of patient reported outcome measures and values clarification exercises. The intervention (called PRISMS) integrated these processes, using a structured form which required patients to identify problems, rate their magnitude and identify their priority. PRISMS was well received by patients and professionals. In the individual qualitative interviews the main themes that emerged from the data related to (a) the content of the PRISMS (b) the process of completing PRISMS and how it could be operationalised in practice and (c) the outcomes of completing PRISMS for the patient. A number of different functions of PRISMS were identified by patients including its use as an aide-memoire, to provide a focus to consultations, to give permission to discuss certain issues, and to provide greater tailoring for the patient.

conclusionsThere was evidence that patients found the PRISMS form acceptable and potentially useful. The challenge encountered by patients in completing PRISMS may encourage exploration of these issues within the consultation, complementing the more 'task focussed' aspects of consultations resulting from introduction of clinical guidelines and financial incentives. Further research is required to provide a rigorous assessment of the ability of tools like PRISMS to achieve genuine change in the process and outcome of consultations.

Indexed as

Health PromotionPatient ParticipationSelf CareAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseFeasibility StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID20630053
PMCPMC2912900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.