ReviewPharmaceutical research2010
Old and new molecular mechanisms associated with platelet resistance to antithrombotics.
Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact ofHospital pharmacy · 2024Article
- The role of clopidogrel resistance-related genetic and epigenetic factors in major adverse cardiovascular events among patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Insights Into Platelet-Derived MicroRNAs in Cardiovascular and Oncologic Diseases: Potential Predictor and Therapeutic Target.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- microRNAs as promising biomarkers of platelet activity in antiplatelet therapy monitoring.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Shear-Dependent Platelet Aggregation: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2019Review
- Synthesis and Preliminary Evaluation of N-Oxide Derivatives for the Prevention of Atherothrombotic Events.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Article
- Overcoming limitations of current antiplatelet drugs: a concerted effort for more profitable strategies of intervention.Annals of medicine · 2011Article
- Platelet aggregation pathway.Pharmacogenetics and genomics · 2011Article
- Comparison of antiplatelet activity of garlic tablets with cardio-protective dose of aspirin in healthy volunteers: a randomized clinical trial.Avicenna journal of phytomedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current available data show that about 5 to 40% of coronary patients treated with conventional doses of antithrombotic drugs do not display adequate antiplatelet response. Nowadays, aspirin remains the main antiplatelet therapy. However, a significant number of patients show platelet resistance to aspirin therapy, and recurrent thrombotic events occur. Combined antithrombotic therapies with thienopyridines, such as clopidogrel have been used to resolve this problem. However, clopidogrel treatment has been also associated with wide response variability, and non-responsiveness to clopidogrel also occurs in some patients. Therefore, the main question arising about the antithrombotic therapy is why particular patients do not benefit from the therapy and how they might be identified to improve their treatment. Different hypotheses have been suggested, including genetic factors, platelet heterogeneity, non-compliance and others. However, it is probably that many molecular mechanisms involved in platelet resistance to antithrombotic therapies still remains unknown. New technologies, such as proteomics and genetic, are beginning to show new unknown biological biomarkers and molecular mechanisms which may be associated with platelet antithrombotic drug resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20628791What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.