Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20628732›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2010

Transfer of the discriminative stimulus effects of Δ9-THC and nicotine from one operant response to another in rats.

Joseph R Troisi, Brian J LeMay, Torbjörn U C Järbe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Occasion setting.Behavioral neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joseph R TroisiDepartment of Psychology, Saint Anselm College, 100 St Anselm Dr, Manchester, NH 03102, USA. jtroisi@anselm.edu
Brian J LeMay
Torbjörn U C Järbe

Funding

Exogenous/endogenous cannabinoids--A comparisonR01DA009064 · NIDA · TEMPLE UNIVERSITY · PI MAKRIYANNIS, ALEXANDROS · 1995 to 2016
$3.2M
NIDA NIH HHS DA 09064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTransfer of the discriminative stimulus effects of two drugs from one operant (original-response) to a topographically different response (transfer-response) that was spared drug discrimination training was investigated. MATERIALS: Eight rats were trained in a counterbalanced one manipulandum (lever press and nose poke) drug discrimination procedure. Counterbalanced IP administered nicotine (0.3 mg/kg) or Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (3.0 mg/kg) functioned as discriminative stimuli. S(D) drugs occasioned sessions of food-reinforcement (variable-interval 30-s schedule); S(Δ) drugs occasioned non-reinforcement. The original-response (lever-pressing or nose-poking) was initially reinforced during 30-min S(D) drug sessions, and non-reinforced on the other alternating S(Δ)-drug sessions.

resultsTwo separate 5-min non-reinforcement tests, counterbalanced by drug order, revealed stimulus control over the original-response by both drugs, which transferred to the transfer-response. Subsequent extinction training of the transfer-response attenuated the original-response response rates with the S(D) drug conditions but had little impact on discriminative control. Discriminative control was reversed for the transfer-response but had little impact on the original-response but, again, reduced response rate.

conclusionThese data demonstrate that (a) discriminative control by two distinct drug states can transfer and modulate a topographically different free-operant response and, (b) as is true for exteroceptive stimuli, drug states that function as antecedents embedded within the operant three-term contingency have differing relationships with the response and the primary reinforcer.

Indexed as

AnimalsConditioning, OperantDiscrimination LearningDronabinolMaleNicotineNicotinic AgonistsPsychotropic DrugsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReinforcement ScheduleDronabinolNicotineNicotinic AgonistsPsychotropic Drugs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.