Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20628485›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology2010

Challenges in treating older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Lagadinou D Eleni, Zoumbos C Nicholas, Spyridonidis Alexandros

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03957915 (A Phase I, First in Human, Open-label Study of Escalating Doses of INA03 Administered Intravenously as Single Agent in Adult Patients With Relapse/Refractory Acute Leukemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03957915 early_phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

A Phase I, First in Human, Open-label Study of Escalating Doses of INA03 Administered Intravenously as Single Agent in Adult Patients With Relapse/Refractory Acute Leukemia

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut Paoli-CalmettesRan2020 to 2025Enrolled33ConditionsAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Recurrent, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, in Relapse, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, in Relapse, Acute Myeloid Leukaemia RecurrentArmsINA03 administration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Patient-Physician Communication in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome.Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Aberrant splicing and drug resistance in AML.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lagadinou D EleniDivision of Hematology/BMT Unit, Patras University Hospital, Patras, Greece.
Zoumbos C Nicholas
Spyridonidis Alexandros
General University Hospital of Patras · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whereas in younger patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment is straightforward and the goal is cure, the optimal treatment decision for older adults remains highly controversial. Physicians need to determine whether palliation, "something" beyond palliation, intensive therapy, or an investigational therapy is the most appropriate treatment option. This requires understanding of the biology and risk profile of the AML, clinical judgment in evaluating the functional status of the patient, communication skills in understanding the patient's wishes and social background, and medical expertise in available therapies. The physician has to accurately inform the patient about (a) the unique biological considerations of his leukemia and his prognosis; (b) the risks and benefits of all available treatment options; (c) novel therapeutic approaches and how the patient can get access to these treatments. Last but not least, he has to recommend a treatment. This paper tries to discuss each of these issues.

Identifiers

PMID20628485
PMCPMC2902223
OpenAlexW2069160383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.