Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20627890›Full record

ArticleGenome research2010

TATA is a modular component of synthetic promoters.

Ilaria Mogno, Francesco Vallania, Robi D Mitra, Barak A Cohen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Development of Terminator-Promoter Bifunctional Elements for Application inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a Heterologous Host for Natural Products.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Biology · 2021
    Review
  17. NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ilaria MognoCenter for Genome Sciences, Department of Genetics, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63108, USA.
Francesco Vallania
Robi D Mitra
Barak A Cohen
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

PROMOTERSR01GM092910 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Barak A Cohen · 2011 to 2026
$6.6M
Deciphering the regulatory code of a cellR01GM078222 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI STORMO, GARY D · 2007 to 2010
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078222NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078222-01A1NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The expression of most genes is regulated by multiple transcription factors. The interactions between transcription factors produce complex patterns of gene expression that are not always obvious from the arrangement of cis-regulatory elements in a promoter. One critical element of promoters is the TATA box, the docking site for the RNA polymerase holoenzyme. Using a synthetic promoter system coupled to a thermodynamic model of combinatorial regulation, we analyze the effects of different strength TATA boxes on various aspects of combinatorial cis-regulation. The thermodynamic model explains 75% of the variance in gene expression in synthetic promoter libraries with different strength TATA boxes, suggesting that many of the salient aspects of cis-regulation are captured by the model. Our results demonstrate that the effect of changing the TATA box on gene expression is the same for all synthetic promoters regardless of the arrangement of cis-regulatory sites we studied. Our analysis also showed that in our synthetic system the strength of the RNA polymerase-TATA interaction does not alter the combinatorial interactions between transcription factors, or between transcription factors and RNA polymerase. Finally, we show that although stronger TATA boxes increase expression in a predictable fashion, stronger TATA boxes have very little effect on noise in our synthetic promoters, regardless of the arrangement of cis-regulatory sites. Our results support a modular model of promoter function, where cis-regulatory elements can be mixed and matched (programmed) with outcomes on expression that are predictable based on the rules of simple protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions.

Indexed as

Binding SitesCodon, InitiatorDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEnhancer Elements, GeneticFlow CytometryGene Expression Regulation, FungalGene LibraryGenes, SyntheticModels, GeneticPeroxidasesPromoter Regions, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTATA BoxThermodynamicsTranscription FactorsCodon, InitiatorDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesPeroxidasesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription FactorsTsa1 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID20627890
PMCPMC2945188
OpenAlexW2124157828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.