Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20626907›Full record

SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2010

Ribavirin for Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Karla Soares-Weiser, Sherine Thomas, Gail Thomson, Paul Garner

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Ribavirin for treating Crimean Congo haemorrhagic fever.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Zoonotic implications of camel diseases in Iran.Veterinary medicine and science · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Use of ribavirin in viruses other than hepatitis C. A review of the evidence.Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.) · 2019
    Review
  14. [Use of ribavirin in viruses other than hepatitis C. A review of the evidence].Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Therapeutic management of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever.Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.) · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karla Soares-WeiserEnhance Reviews Ltd, 5 Percy Street, Office 4, London, W1T 1DG, UK. karla@enhance-reviews.com
Sherine Thomas
Gail Thomson
Paul Garner
Cochrane · GBKleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) · GBRoyal Liverpool University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCrimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever epidemics often occur in areas where health services are limited, and result in high case fatality rates. Besides intensive care, ribavirin is often recommended. A solid evidence base for the use of this drug will help justify assuring access to the drug in areas where epidemics are common.

methodsWe carried out a systematic review of observational and experimental studies of people with suspected or confirmed Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever that included comparisons between patients given ribavirin and those not. We extracted data on mortality, hospital stay, and adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed using a standard checklist, and data were presented in meta-analytical graphs, stratified by study design, and GRADE tables presented. The risk of bias was summarised using the GRADE method.

results21 unique studies, including one randomised controlled trial of ribavirin, were included. Quality of the evidence was very low, with a Down and Black median score of 4 (maximum possible 33). Ribavirin treatment was not shown to be superior to no ribavirin treatment for mortality rate in a single RCT (RR: 1.13, 95%CI: 0.29 to 4.32, 136 participants, GRADE=low quality evidence); but ribavirin was associated with reduced mortality by 44% when compared to no ribavirin treatment in the pooled observational studies (RR: 0.56, 95%CI: 0.35 to 0.90, 955 participants; GRADE=very low quality evidence). Adverse events were more common with the ribavirin patients, but no severe adverse events were reported. No difference in length of hospital stay was reported.

conclusionsNo clear message of benefit is available from the current data on ribavirin as observational data are heavily confounded, and the one trial carried out has limited power. However, ribavirin could potentially have benefits in this condition and these results clearly indicate a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial in the context of good quality supportive care, is urgently needed and ethically justified.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntiviral AgentsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHemorrhagic Fever, CrimeanHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntiviral AgentsRibavirin

Identifiers

PMID20626907
PMCPMC2912908
OpenAlexW2151161022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.