Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20626852›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2010

Pharmacoproteomic study of the effects of chondroitin and glucosamine sulfate on human articular chondrocytes.

Valentina Calamia, Cristina Ruiz-Romero, Beatriz Rocha, Patricia Fernández-Puente, Jesús Mateos, Eulàlia Montell, Josep Vergés, Francisco J Blanco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Which CAM modalities are worth considering?The Journal of family practice · 2014
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Specialty supplement use and biologic measures of oxidative stress and DNA damage.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2013
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Valentina CalamiaRheumatology Division, INIBIC-CHU A Coruña, As Xubias s/n, A Coruña 15006, Spain. valentina.calamia@sergas.es
Cristina Ruiz-Romero
Beatriz Rocha
Patricia Fernández-Puente
Jesús Mateos
Eulàlia Montell
Josep Vergés
Francisco J Blanco
Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña · ESBioibérica (Spain) · ESInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChondroitin sulfate (CS) and glucosamine sulfate (GS) are symptomatic slow-acting drugs for osteoarthritis (OA) widely used in clinic. Despite their widespread use, knowledge of the specific molecular mechanisms of their action is limited. The aim of this work is to explore the utility of a pharmacoproteomic approach for the identification of specific molecules involved in the pharmacological effect of GS and CS.

methodsChondrocytes obtained from three healthy donors were treated with GS 10 mM and/or CS 200 μg/mL, and then stimulated with interleukin-1β (IL-1β) 10 ng/mL. Whole cell proteins were isolated 24 hours later and resolved by two-dimensional electrophoresis. The gels were stained with SYPRORuby. Modulated proteins were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF/TOF) mass spectrometry. Real-time PCR and Western blot analyses were performed to validate our results.

resultsA total of 31 different proteins were altered by GS or/and CS treatment when compared to control. Regarding their predicted biological function, 35% of the proteins modulated by GS are involved in signal transduction pathways, 15% in redox and stress response, and 25% in protein synthesis and folding processes. Interestingly, CS affects mainly energy production (31%) and metabolic pathways (13%), decreasing the expression levels of ten proteins. The chaperone GRP78 was found to be remarkably increased by GS alone and in combination with CS, a fact that unveils a putative mechanism for the reported anti-inflammatory effect of GS in OA. On the other hand, the antioxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) was significantly decreased by both drugs and synergistically by their combination, thus suggesting a drug-induced decrease of the oxidative stress caused by IL-1β in chondrocytes.

conclusionsCS and GS differentially modulate the proteomic profile of human chondrocytes. This pharmacoproteomic approach unravels the complex intracellular mechanisms that are modulated by these drugs on IL1β-stimulated human articular chondrocytes.

Indexed as

ProteomicsCartilageCells, CulturedChondrocytesChondroitin SulfatesElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPGlucosamineHumansInterleukin-1betaKnee JointOsteoarthritis, KneeReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationSuperoxide DismutaseSuperoxide Dismutase 2Chondroitin SulfatesEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPGlucosamineHSPA5 protein, humanInterleukin-1betaSuperoxide DismutaseSuperoxide Dismutase 2

Identifiers

PMID20626852
PMCPMC2945029
OpenAlexW2164402473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.