Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20625793›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2010

Multiple catalytically active thioredoxin folds: a winning strategy for many functions.

Emilia Pedone, Danila Limauro, Katia D'Ambrosio, Giuseppina De Simone, Simonetta Bartolucci

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Peroxiredoxins in parasites.Antioxidants & redox signaling · 2012
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Atomic resolution insights into curli fiber biogenesis.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2011
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emilia PedoneIstituto di Biostrutture e Bioimmagini-CNR, Naples, Italy.
Danila Limauro
Katia D'Ambrosio
Giuseppina De Simone
Simonetta Bartolucci
Institute of Biostructure and Bioimaging · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Thioredoxin (Trx) fold is a versatile protein scaffold consisting of a four-stranded β-sheet surrounded by three α-helices. Various insertions are possible on this structural theme originating different proteins, which show a variety of functions and specificities. During evolution, the assembly of different Trx fold domains has been used many times to build new multi-domain proteins able to perform a large number of catalytic functions. To clarify the interaction mode of the different Trx domains within a multi-domain structure and how their combination can affect catalytic performances, in this review, we report on a structural and functional analysis of the most representative proteins containing more than one catalytically active Trx domain: the eukaryotic protein disulfide isomerases (PDIs), the thermophilic protein disulfide oxidoreductases (PDOs) and the hybrid peroxiredoxins (Prxs).

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsArchaeaArchaeal ProteinsBacteriaBacterial ProteinsCatalytic DomainHumansModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataOxidoreductasesPeroxiredoxinsProtein Disulfide-IsomerasesSequence AlignmentThioredoxinsArchaeal ProteinsBacterial ProteinsOxidoreductasesPeroxiredoxinsProtein Disulfide-IsomerasesThioredoxins

Identifiers

PMID20625793
PMCPMC11115506
OpenAlexW2072668313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.