ArticlePloS one2010
MER41 repeat sequences contain inducible STAT1 binding sites.
Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of KRAB zinc-finger proteins in expanding the domestication potential of transposable elements.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Cooperation of transposable elements to endow global networks of initiators of hybrid assembly pathways of endogenous multiprotein complexes.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Human Endogenous Retroviruses and Diseases.MedComm · 2025Review
- Article
- Further varieties of ancient endogenous retrovirus in human DNA.Mobile DNA · 2025Article
- RNA sensing induced by chromosome missegregation augments anti-tumor immunity.Molecular cell · 2025Article
- HERV-K10 as a mediator of immune modulation in hepatitis infections.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Interferon-Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- Towards targeting transposable elements for cancer therapy.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2024Review
- Regulation of endogenous retrovirus-derived regulatory elements by GATA2/3 and MSX2 in human trophoblast stem cells.Genome research · 2023Article
- Endogenous Retrovirus Elements Are Co-Expressed with IFN Stimulation Genes in the JAK-STAT Pathway.Viruses · 2022Article
- Roles of transposable elements in the regulation of mammalian transcription.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2022Review
- Caenorhabditis elegans transposable elements harbor diverse transcription factor DNA-binding sites.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Article
- Endogenous Retroviruses Drive Lineage-Specific Regulatory Evolution across Primate and Rodent Placentae.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Widespread Exaptation of L1 Transposons for Transcription Factor Binding in Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Genome-wide bioinformatic analyses predict key host and viral factors in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Endogenous retroviruses in the origins and treatment of cancer.Genome biology · 2021Review
- Endogenous Retrovirus-Derived lncRNA BANCR Promotes Cardiomyocyte Migration in Humans and Non-human Primates.Developmental cell · 2020Article
- Transposable elements as a potent source of diversePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chromatin immunoprecipitation combined with massively parallel sequencing methods (ChIP-seq) is becoming the standard approach to study interactions of transcription factors (TF) with genomic sequences. At the example of public STAT1 ChIP-seq data sets, we present novel approaches for the interpretation of ChIP-seq data.We compare recently developed approaches to determine STAT1 binding sites from ChIP-seq data. Assessing the content of the established consensus sequence for STAT1 binding sites, we find that the usage of "negative control" ChIP-seq data fails to provide substantial advantages. We derive a single refined probabilistic model of STAT1 binding sequences from these ChIP-seq data. Contrary to previous claims, we find no evidence that STAT1 binds to multiple distinct motifs upon interferon-gamma stimulation in vivo. While a large majority of genomic sites with high ChIP-seq signal is associated with a nucleotide sequence resembling a STAT1 binding site, only a very small subset of the over 5 million potential STAT1 binding sites in the human genome is covered by ChIP-seq data. Furthermore a surprisingly large fraction of the ChIP-seq signal (5%) is absorbed by a small family of repetitive sequences (MER41). The observation of the binding of activated STAT1 protein to a specific repetitive element bolsters similar reports concerning p53 and other TFs, and strengthens the notion of an involvement of repeats in gene regulation. Incidentally MER41 are specific to primates, consequently, regulatory mechanisms in the IFN-STAT pathway might fundamentally differ between primates and rodents. On a methodological aspect, the presence of large numbers of nearly identical binding sites in repetitive sequences may lead to wrong conclusions about intrinsic binding preferences of TF as illustrated by the spacing analysis STAT1 tandem motifs. Therefore, ChIP-seq data should be analyzed independently within repetitive and non-repetitive sequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.