Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20625280›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cardiology2010

Walking: the first steps in cardiovascular disease prevention.

Elaine M Murtagh, Marie H Murphy, Janne Boone-Heinonen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cardiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 171 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Elaine M MurtaghDepartment of Arts Education and Physical Education, Mary Immaculate College, University of Limerick, Ireland. elaine.murtagh@mic.ul.ie
Marie H Murphy
Janne Boone-Heinonen
University of Limerick · IEUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

UNC Interdisciplinary Obesity Training (IDOT)(RMI)T32MH075854 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI POPKIN, BARRY M · 2005 to 2009
$1.2M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH075854NIMH NIH HHS T32MH075854-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewHealth professionals are presented with the challenge of prescribing physical activity that is likely to be sustained by the sedentary majority. Walking is eminently suited to physical activity prescription for inactive individuals as it is accessible to men and women of all ages and social groups and poses little risk of injury. This paper reviews recent evidence of the health benefits of walking and promotion of walking behavior. RECENT

findingsLarge observational studies consistently show associations between walking and cardiovascular disease endpoints over long periods of follow-up. Intervention studies further support the health benefits of walking, showing improvements in clinical biomarkers and measures after shorter periods of follow-up. Walking appears to have cardiovascular disease-related health benefits in younger, middle-aged, and older men and women, in both healthy and patient populations. Pedometer-based, mobile phone-based, and computer-based programs are effective in increasing walking levels. Neighborhood and workplace amenities and programs may be important supports for walking behaviors. SUMMARY: Walking has the potential to play a key role in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Clinicians can prescribe walking to assist patients meet physical activity recommendations and help identify supports available to the patient.

Indexed as

WalkingAdultAgedCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrescriptions

Identifiers

PMID20625280
PMCPMC3098122
OpenAlexW2048524132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.