ArticleGenome biology and evolution2010
Evolution of neuronal and endothelial transcriptomes in primates.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- AAV Gene Therapy Drug Development and Translation of Engineered Ocular and Neurotropic Capsids: A Systematic Review Using Natural Language Processing.Clinical and translational science · 2025Pooled it
- Intravenous functional gene transfer throughout the brain of non-human primates using AAV.Research square · 2023Article
- Broadening primate genomics: new insights into the ecology and evolution of primate gene regulation.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2020Review
- An integrative genome-wide transcriptome reveals that candesartan is neuroprotective and a candidate therapeutic for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2016Article
- Analysis of Gene Expression Profiles in the Human Brain Stem, Cerebellum and Cerebral Cortex.PloS one · 2016Article
- Transcriptomic insights into human brain evolution: acceleration, neutrality, heterochrony.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2014Review
- Evolutionary dynamics of coding and non-coding transcriptomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2014Review
- Dissecting gene expression at the blood-brain barrier.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2014Review
- MicroRNA-driven developmental remodeling in the brain distinguishes humans from other primates.PLoS biology · 2011Article
- De novo origin of human protein-coding genes.PLoS genetics · 2011Article
- Brain expression quantitative trait locus mapping informs genetic studies of psychiatric diseases.Neuroscience bulletin · 2011Review
- Characterization of bovine immortalized luteal endothelial cells: action of cytokines on production and content of arachidonic acid metabolites.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study of gene expression evolution in vertebrates has hitherto focused on the analysis of transcriptomes in tissues of different species. However, because a tissue is made up of different cell types, and cell types differ with respect to their transcriptomes, the analysis of tissues offers a composite picture of transcriptome evolution. The isolation of individual cells from tissue sections opens up the opportunity to study gene expression evolution at the cell type level. We have stained neurons and endothelial cells in human brains by antibodies against cell type-specific marker proteins, isolated the cells using laser capture microdissection, and identified genes preferentially expressed in the two cell types. We analyze these two classes of genes with respect to their expression in 62 different human tissues, with respect to their expression in 44 human "postmortem" brains from different developmental stages and with respect to between-species brain expression differences. We find that genes preferentially expressed in neurons differ less across tissues and developmental stages than genes preferentially expressed in endothelial cells. We also observe less expression differences within primate species for neuronal transcriptomes. In stark contrast, we see more gene expression differences between humans, chimpanzees, and rhesus macaques relative to within-species differences in genes expressed preferentially in neurons than in genes expressed in endothelial cells. This suggests that neuronal and endothelial transcriptomes evolve at different rates within brain tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.