Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20624472›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2010

Discovering genetic associations with high-dimensional neuroimaging phenotypes: A sparse reduced-rank regression approach.

Maria Vounou, Thomas E Nichols, Giovanni Montana, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Generalized Connectivity Matrix Response Regression with Applications in Brain Connectivity Studies.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2023
    Article
  11. Partially Observed Dynamic Tensor Response Regression.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria VounouStatistics Section, Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, UK.
Thomas E Nichols
Giovanni Montana
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
UC Davis Alzheimer's Disease Core CenterP30AG010129 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI DECARLI, CHARLES · 1991 to 2020
$28.3M
Resource for MRI of Neurodegenerative DisordersP41EB015904 · NIBIB · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2012 to 2012
$1.2M
"MR Morphometrics and Cognitive Decline Rate in Large-Scale Aging Studies"K01AG030514 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CARMICHAEL, OWEN T. · 2008 to 2012
$495k
Medical Research Council G0900908NIA NIH HHS K01 AG030514NIA NIH HHS K01AG030514NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010129NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing interest in performing genome-wide searches for associations between genetic variants and brain imaging phenotypes. While much work has focused on single scalar valued summaries of brain phenotype, accounting for the richness of imaging data requires a brain-wide, genome-wide search. In particular, the standard approach based on mass-univariate linear modelling (MULM) does not account for the structured patterns of correlations present in each domain. In this work, we propose sparse reduced rank regression (sRRR), a strategy for multivariate modelling of high-dimensional imaging responses (measurements taken over regions of interest or individual voxels) and genetic covariates (single nucleotide polymorphisms or copy number variations), which enforces sparsity in the regression coefficients. Such sparsity constraints ensure that the model performs simultaneous genotype and phenotype selection. Using simulation procedures that accurately reflect realistic human genetic variation and imaging correlations, we present detailed evaluations of the sRRR method in comparison with the more traditional MULM approach. In all settings considered, sRRR has better power to detect deleterious genetic variants compared to MULM. Important issues concerning model selection and connections to existing latent variable models are also discussed. This work shows that sRRR offers a promising alternative for detecting brain-wide, genome-wide associations.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalModels, StatisticalPhenotypeQuantitative Trait, HeritableBrainBrain MappingGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRegression AnalysisROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID20624472
PMCPMC5253177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.