Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20624288›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2010

Long noncoding RNA genes: conservation of sequence and brain expression among diverse amniotes.

Rebecca A Chodroff, Leo Goodstadt, Tamara M Sirey, Peter L Oliver, Kay E Davies, Eric D Green, Zoltán Molnár, Chris P Ponting

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 146 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
146citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

146 citing papers in PubMed, 247 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evolutionary Conservation of RNA Secondary Structure.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Designing libraries for pooled CRISPR functional screens of long noncoding RNAs.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022
    Review
  20. The Genome of the "Sea Vomit"Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article

86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca A ChodroffDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy, and Genetics, Le Gros Clark Building South Parks Road, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QX, UK.
Leo Goodstadt
Tamara M Sirey
Peter L Oliver
Kay E Davies
Eric D Green
Zoltán Molnár
Chris P Ponting
University of Oxford · GBNational Human Genome Research Institute · US

Funding

Structural and Functional Analysis of Mammalian ChromosomesZIAHG000060 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GREEN, ERIC · 2009 to 2010
$4.3M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F003285/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F007590/1Intramural NIH HHSMedical Research Council MC_U137761446Medical Research Council MC_U137761449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong considered to be the building block of life, it is now apparent that protein is only one of many functional products generated by the eukaryotic genome. Indeed, more of the human genome is transcribed into noncoding sequence than into protein-coding sequence. Nevertheless, whilst we have developed a deep understanding of the relationships between evolutionary constraint and function for protein-coding sequence, little is known about these relationships for non-coding transcribed sequence. This dearth of information is partially attributable to a lack of established non-protein-coding RNA (ncRNA) orthologs among birds and mammals within sequence and expression databases.

resultsHere, we performed a multi-disciplinary study of four highly conserved and brain-expressed transcripts selected from a list of mouse long intergenic noncoding RNA (lncRNA) loci that generally show pronounced evolutionary constraint within their putative promoter regions and across exon-intron boundaries. We identify some of the first lncRNA orthologs present in birds (chicken), marsupial (opossum), and eutherian mammals (mouse), and investigate whether they exhibit conservation of brain expression. In contrast to conventional protein-coding genes, the sequences, transcriptional start sites, exon structures, and lengths for these non-coding genes are all highly variable.

conclusionsThe biological relevance of lncRNAs would be highly questionable if they were limited to closely related phyla. Instead, their preservation across diverse amniotes, their apparent conservation in exon structure, and similarities in their pattern of brain expression during embryonic and early postnatal stages together indicate that these are functional RNA molecules, of which some have roles in vertebrate brain development.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainChickensConserved SequenceEvolution, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenetic LociMiceRNA, UntranslatedSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidVertebratesRNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID20624288
PMCPMC2926783
OpenAlexW2086433728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.