Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20623342›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2010

Virological investigations in sudden unexpected deaths in infancy (SUDI).

M A Weber, J C Hartley, M T Ashworth, M Malone, N J Sebire

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Infection: the neglected paradigm in SIDS research.Archives of disease in childhood · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M A WeberDepartment of Paediatric Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children and UCL Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, UK. WeberM1@gosh.nhs.uk
J C Hartley
M T Ashworth
M Malone
N J Sebire
University College London · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have implicated viral infections in the pathogenesis of sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI), and routine virological investigations are recommended by current SUDI autopsy protocols. The aim of this study is to determine the role of post-mortem virology in establishing a cause of death. A retrospective review of 546 SUDI autopsies was carried out as part of a larger series of >1,500 consecutive paediatric autopsies performed over a 10-year period, 1996-2005, in a single specialist centre. Virological tests were performed as part of the post-mortem examination in 490 (90%) of the 546 SUDI autopsies, comprising 4,639 individual virological tests, of which 79% were performed on lung tissue samples. Diagnostic methods included immunofluorescence assays (using a routine respiratory virus panel; 98% of cases), cell culture (61%), rapid culture techniques such as the DEAFF test for CMV (55%), PCR (13%), electron microscopy (10%), and others. Virus was identified in only 18 cases (4%), viz. five cases of enterovirus, four of RSV, three of HSV and CMV, and one each of adenovirus, influenza virus and HIV. In seven of the 18 cases the death was classified as due to viral infection, whilst of the remaining 11 cases, death was due to bacterial infection in five, a non-infective cause in one and unexplained in five. Virus was identified in 33% of deaths due to probable viral infections, but also in 6% of SUDI due to bacterial infections, and in 2% of SUDI due to known non-infective causes and unexplained SUDI. When predominantly using immunofluorescence, virus is identified in only a small proportion of SUDI autopsies, resulting in a contribution to the final cause of death in <2% of SUDI post-mortem examinations. Routine post-mortem virological analysis by means of an immunofluorescence respiratory virus panel appears to be of limited benefit in SUDI for the purposes of determining cause of death. Application of a broader panel using more sensitive detection techniques may reveal more viruses, although their contribution to the final cause of death requires further exploration.

Indexed as

Cause of DeathInfant MortalityAutopsyBacterial InfectionsChi-Square DistributionFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLondonMicroscopy, ElectronPolymerase Chain ReactionPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID20623342
OpenAlexW2051665709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.