Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20623247›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2011

Comparative evaluation of preclinical in vivo models for the assessment of replicating retroviral vectors for the treatment of glioblastoma.

Juraj Hlavaty, Gerrit Jandl, Melissa Liszt, Helga Petznek, Marielle König-Schuster, Jenny Sedlak, Monika Egerbacher, Jakob Weissenberger, Brian Salmons, Walter H Günzburg and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Oncolytic viruses: From bench to bedside with a focus on safety.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Juraj HlavatyInstitute of Virology, Department of Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Gerrit Jandl
Melissa Liszt
Helga Petznek
Marielle König-Schuster
Jenny Sedlak
Monika Egerbacher
Jakob Weissenberger
Brian Salmons
Walter H Günzburg
Matthias Renner
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATUniversity of Veterinary Medicine · HUGoethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite impressive improvements in neurosurgical techniques, radiation and chemotherapy during the past few years, little progress has been made in the treatment of malignant gliomas. Recently, the efficacy of suicide gene therapy based on replication-competent retroviral (RCR) vectors as delivery vehicles for the therapeutic gene has been described in the treatment of experimental cancer, including gliomas. In this study, we have thus critically evaluated a panel of human and rodent glioma/glioblastoma cell lines (U-87MG, U-118MG, LN-18, LN-229, 8-MG-BA, 42-MG-BA, A-172, T-98G, UVW, C6, 9L, G-26, GL-261, Tu-2449, Tu-9648) with respect to RCR virus vector spread, sensitivity towards the cytosine deaminase (CD)/5-flurocytosine (5-FC)/5-flurouracil (5-FU) suicide system, and orthotopic growth characteristics in mice to identify suitable preclinical animal models for the development of a glioblastoma gene therapy. Rapid virus spread was observed in eight out of nine human cell lines tested in vitro. As expected, only CD-expressing cells became sensitive to 5-FC, due to their ability to convert the prodrug in its toxic form, 5-FU. All LD(50) values were within the range of concentrations obtained in human body fluids after conventional antifungal 5-FC administration. In addition, a significant bystander effect was observed in all human glioma cell lines tested. Injection of the RCR vector into pre-established orthotopic mouse tumor xenografts revealed substantial infection and virus spread of tumor tissue from most cell types.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsAnimalsBrain NeoplasmsBystander EffectCytosine DeaminaseDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalFlucytosineFluorouracilGenes, Transgenic, SuicideGlioblastomaHumansMiceMice, NudeMice, SCIDCytosine DeaminaseFlucytosineFluorouracilProdrugs

Identifiers

PMID20623247
OpenAlexW1998018223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.