Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20623243›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2011

Diode laser treatment in therapy-resistant allergic rhinitis: impact on nasal obstruction and associated symptoms.

Philipp P Caffier, Hans Scherer, Konrad Neumann, Sven Lück, Harald Enzmann, Andreas Haisch

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Surgical Intervention in Allergic Rhinitis: Stuffy Versus Sneezy Runny Nose.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Indications for surgery in refractory rhinitis.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Diode Laser Reduction of Symptomatic Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philipp P CaffierDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. philipp.caffier@charite.de
Hans Scherer
Konrad Neumann
Sven Lück
Harald Enzmann
Andreas Haisch
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ideal treatment in severe obstructive allergic rhinitis unresponsive to standard therapy is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of endonasal corrective laser surgery in perennial (pAR) and seasonal (sAR) allergic rhinitis. Forty subjects (20 pAR, 20 sAR) underwent videoendoscopic diode laser surgery. Examinations were performed preoperatively and at follow-ups 1, 12, and 24 months after surgery, including objective parameters (rhinomanometry, videoendoscopy, allergy tests) and subjective visual analog scales (evaluation of surgery, satisfaction, allergic symptoms). Of all patients, 95% received inferior turbinate, 40% septal, and 15% middle turbinate surgery. Postoperatively, two subjects showed considerable residual symptomatology (95% response rate). Throughout follow-up, objective rhinomanometry and subjective scores for nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, sneezing, itching, and overall satisfaction improved significantly with time (p < 0.0005). The improvement was greatest for nasal obstruction, initially higher in pAR but more sustained in sAR. After 2 years, 30% sAR and 40% pAR subjects had been receiving pharmacotherapy due to recurrent symptoms. The allergic condition remained unchanged (skin and in-vitro tests). Outpatient endonasal diode laser surgery appears to be effective, safe and well tolerated for treating otherwise therapy-resistant pAR and sAR, providing long-lasting symptom reduction with complete stop or decreased use of antiallergics.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHumansLasers, SemiconductorMaleMiddle AgedNasal ObstructionNasal SeptumRhinitis, Allergic, PerennialRhinitis, Allergic, SeasonalRhinomanometryTreatment OutcomeTurbinatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20623243
OpenAlexW2085486169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.