Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20623197›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2010

Pancreatic cancer risk counselling and screening: impact on perceived risk and psychological functioning.

Christine Maheu, Andrea Vodermaier, Heidi Rothenmund, Steve Gallinger, Paola Ardiles, Kara Semotiuk, Spring Holter, Saumea Thayalan, Mary Jane Esplen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04024345 (Surveillance Program in High-risk Individuals for Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04024345 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Surveillance Program in High-risk Individuals for Pancreatic Cancer: Prospective Analysis of the Emotional Impact

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata VeronaRan2017 to 2021Enrolled150ConditionsPancreatic Cancer, Psychological DistressArmsBarratt Simplified Measure of Social Status (BSMSS), Global Assessment of Functioning scale (GAF), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (Brief COPE),
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Familial Pancreatic Cancer.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  15. Pancreatic cancer risk to siblings of probands in bilineal cancer settings.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Christine MaheuYork University, Toronto, ON, Canada. cmaheu@uhnres.utoronto.ca
Andrea Vodermaier
Heidi Rothenmund
Steve Gallinger
Paola Ardiles
Kara Semotiuk
Spring Holter
Saumea Thayalan
Mary Jane Esplen
Mount Sinai Hospital · CAUniversity Health Network · CAInstitut für Urheber- und Medienrecht · DEYork University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals at increased risk for pancreatic cancer who undergo screening can experience psychological and emotional distress. The objective of this study is to determine whether individuals participating in a pancreatic cancer screening program experience disruptions in risk perception, cancer-related anxiety or emotional distress. A pretestposttest design was used to examine perceived risk and psychological functioning of individuals participating in a pancreatic cancer screening protocol. The screening protocol includes genetic counselling, transcutaneous abdominal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and blood collection and eligible participants included individuals with a family history of pancreatic cancer or BRCA2 mutation carriers. At baseline, participants (n = 198) showed low to moderate levels of risk perception, pancreatic cancer-related anxiety, and general distress. Participants with familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) (n = 131) endorsed higher risk perception of pancreatic cancer than the BRCA2 carriers (n = 67) (perceived lifetime risk 42 vs. 15%), but did not differ on cancer worry or general distress prior to the first study appointment. From baseline to 3 months follow-up, no significant time or time by group interactions emerged on risk perception or general distress, but cancer worry decreased over time for the FPC group regardless of the number of affected relatives. Our findings indicate that participation in a pancreatic cancer screening program does not lead to a significant increase in risk perception, cancer worry, or general distress and that participants with high baseline levels of risk perception and distress may benefit from a more comprehensive risk assessment and psychological support.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnxietyAttitude to HealthEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedPancreatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID20623197
OpenAlexW2078818735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.