Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20623111›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2010

Distinct neural mechanisms underlying acute and repeated administration of antipsychotic drugs in rat avoidance conditioning.

Ming Li, Tao Sun, Chen Zhang, Gang Hu

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ming LiDepartment of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 68588, USA. mli2@unl.edu
Tao Sun
Chen Zhang
Gang Hu
University of Nebraska–Lincoln · USNanjing Medical University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

Anxiolytic Property of Atypical AntipsychoticsR21MH079894 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI LI, MING · 2008 to 2009
$362k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH079894NIMH NIH HHS R21MH079894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleAcute antipsychotic treatment disrupts conditioned avoidance responding, and repeated treatment induces a sensitization- or tolerance-like effect. However, the neurochemical mechanisms underlying both acute and repeated antipsychotic effects remain to be determined.

objectiveThe present study examined the neuroreceptor mechanisms of haloperidol, clozapine, and olanzapine effect in a rat two-way conditioned avoidance model.

methodsWell-trained Sprague-Dawley rats were administered with haloperidol (0.05 mg/kg, sc), clozapine (10.0 mg/kg, sc), or olanzapine (1.0 mg/kg, sc) together with either saline, quinpirole (a selective dopamine D(2/3) agonist, 1.0 mg/kg, sc), or 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodo-amphetamine (DOI; a selective 5-HT(2A/2C) agonist, 2.5 mg/kg, sc), and their conditioned avoidance responses were tested over 3 days. After 2 days of drug-free retraining, the repeated treatment effect was assessed in a challenge test.

resultsPretreatment of quinpirole, but not DOI, attenuated the acute haloperidol-induced disruption of avoidance responding and to a lesser extent, olanzapine-induced disruption. In contrast, pretreatment of DOI, but not quinpirole, attenuated the acute effect of clozapine. On the repeated effect, pretreatment of DOI, but not quinpirole, attenuated the potentiated disruption of haloperidol, whereas pretreatment of quinpirole attenuated the potentiated disruption of olanzapine but enhanced the tolerance-like effect of clozapine.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that acute haloperidol and olanzapine disrupt avoidance responding primarily by blocking dopamine D(2) receptors, whereas acute clozapine exerts its disruptive effect primarily by blocking the 5-HT(2A) receptors. The repeated haloperidol effect may be mediated by 5-HT(2A/2C) blockade-initiated neural processes, whereas the repeated clozapine and olanzapine effect may be mediated by D(2/3) blockade-initiated neural processes.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntipsychotic AgentsAvoidance LearningBenzodiazepinesClozapineDopamine AntagonistsDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsDrug Administration ScheduleHaloperidolMaleOlanzapineRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySerotonin 5-HT2 Receptor AntagonistsSerotonin AntagonistsAntipsychotic AgentsBenzodiazepinesClozapineDopamine AntagonistsDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsHaloperidolOlanzapineSerotonin 5-HT2 Receptor AntagonistsSerotonin Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID20623111
PMCPMC5248568
OpenAlexW2088626092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.