Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20623016›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2010

Gender differences in public and private drinking contexts: a multi-level GENACIS analysis.

Jason C Bond, Sarah C M Roberts, Thomas K Greenfield, Rachael Korcha, Yu Ye, Madhabika B Nayak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Gender Equality, Drinking Cultures and Second-Hand Harms from Alcohol in the 50 US States.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Harms That Drinkers Cause: Regional Variations Within Countries.International journal of alcohol and drug research · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Drinking patterns and victimization among male and female students in Mexico.Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire) · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jason C BondAlcohol Research Group, Suite 400, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA. jbond@arg.org
Sarah C M Roberts
Thomas K Greenfield
Rachael Korcha
Yu Ye
Madhabika B Nayak

Funding

TREND &STRUCTURE OF ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE--GENERAL POPULATION 1990 SURVEY DATAP50AA005595 · NIAAA · WESTERN CONSORTIUM FOR PUBLIC HEALTH · PI MARTINEZ, PRISCILLA · 1985 to 2025
$34.1M
GRADUATE RESEARCH TRAINING ON ALCOHOL PROBLEMST32AA007240 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI William C. Kerr · 1985 to 2026
$7.5M
Statistical and Data Services Infrastructure CoreP30AA005595 · NIAAA · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI KERR, WILLIAM C. · 2006 to 2010
$7.2M
GENDER, ALCOHOL, AND CULTURE: SECONDARY DATA ANALYSESR01AA015775 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA · PI WILSNACK, SHARON C · 2007 to 2011
$2.4M
GENDER, CULTURE, AND ALCOHOL: A MULTI-NATIONAL STUDYR21AA012941 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA · PI WILSNACK, SHARON C · 2002 to 2004
$373k
NIAAA NIH HHS P30 AA005595NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA005595NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA015775NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA012941NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007240NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA07240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This multi-national study hypothesized that higher levels of country-level gender equality would predict smaller differences in the frequency of women's compared to men's drinking in public (like bars and restaurants) settings and possibly private (home or party) settings. GENACIS project survey data with drinking contexts included 22 countries in Europe (8); the Americas (7); Asia (3); Australasia (2), and Africa (2), analyzed using hierarchical linear models (individuals nested within country). Age, gender and marital status were individual predictors; country-level gender equality as well as equality in economic participation, education, and political participation, and reproductive autonomy and context of violence against women measures were country-level variables. In separate models, more reproductive autonomy, economic participation, and educational attainment and less violence against women predicted smaller differences in drinking in public settings. Once controlling for country-level economic status, only equality in economic participation predicted the size of the gender difference. Most country-level variables did not explain the gender difference in frequency of drinking in private settings. Where gender equality predicted this difference, the direction of the findings was opposite from the direction in public settings, with more equality predicting a larger gender difference, although this relationship was no longer significant after controlling for country-level economic status. Findings suggest that country-level gender equality may influence gender differences in drinking. However, the effects of gender equality on drinking may depend on the specific alcohol measure, in this case drinking context, as well as on the aspect of gender equality considered. Similar studies that use only global measures of gender equality may miss key relationships. We consider potential implications for alcohol related consequences, policy and public health.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingSex FactorsFemaleHumansInternationalityMalecontext of drinkingcross-national studycultureeconomic developmentGENACISgender equityhierarchical linear models (HLM)on- and off-premises alcohol use

Identifiers

PMID20623016
PMCPMC2898041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.