Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2011
Impact of intensity of conditioning therapy in patients aged 40-60 years with AML/myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing allogeneic transplantation.
Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of reduced-intensity and myeloablative conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a meta-analysis.Stem cells and development · 2014Pooled it
- Comparison of conditioning regimens of various intensities for allogeneic hematopoietic SCT using HLA-identical sibling donors in AML and MDS with <10% BM blasts: a report from EBMT.Bone marrow transplantation · 2013Trial
- Reduced-intensity allografting in patients with therapy-related myeloid neoplasms and active primary malignancies.Bone marrow transplantation · 2011Trial
- Secondary oral cancer following hematopoietic cell transplantation.Bone marrow transplantation · 2021Article
- Myeloablative Conditioning for Allogeneic Transplantation Results in Superior Disease-Free Survival for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes with Low/Intermediate but not High Disease Risk Index: A Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Study.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2021Article
- Increased overall and bacterial infections following myeloablative allogeneic HCT for patients with AML in CR1.Blood advances · 2019Article
- T Cell Depletion as an Alternative Approach for Patients 55 Years or Older Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation as Curative Therapy for Hematologic Malignancies.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2017Article
- Article
- Comparable outcomes post allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for patients with de novo or secondary acute myeloid leukemia in first remission.Bone marrow transplantation · 2015Article
- Reduced-intensity and myeloablative conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: a meta-analysis and systematic review.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2014Article
- Current status of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for MDS.Current pharmaceutical design · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The optimum intensity of conditioning therapy in patients aged 40-60 years with AML and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) remains uncertain. We compared outcomes of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) and conventional intensity conditioning (CIC) in 101 consecutive patients (CIC, 62; RIC, 39) with AML and MDS aged 40-60 years undergoing alloHCT from 2002 to 2008 at our centre. The median age, unrelated transplants and co-morbidity index were higher in the RIC group. Median OS and EFS were 31.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 12.8-59.3) and 20.7 months (95% CI: 11.0-30.4), respectively, with no significant difference between the two cohorts. The 3-year treatment-related mortality (TRM) and relapse were 28% (95% CI: 21-39) and 25% (95% CI: 17-36), respectively, with no significant difference between the two cohorts. No difference in OS, EFS, TRM or relapse was observed between the two cohorts in the multivariate model. Only disease risk was significantly associated with OS (Hazard ratio (HR): 1.85, CI: 1.01-3.45), EFS (HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.00-3.10) and cumulative relapse (HR: 3.24, 95% CI: 1.08-10.12). Disease biology rather than intensity of conditioning regimen seems to determine outcomes of alloHCT in patients aged 40-60 years with AML/MDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.