Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20621899›Full record

ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2010

Sexually transmitted diseases among users of erectile dysfunction drugs: analysis of claims data.

Anupam B Jena, Dana P Goldman, Amee Kamdar, Darius N Lakdawalla, Yang Lu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Care of the human immunodeficiency virus-infected menopausal woman.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2012
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sexually transmitted infections in the elderly: A growing concern in geriatric care.Indian journal of sexually transmitted diseases and AIDS
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anupam B JenaHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. jena.anupam@mgh.harvard.edu
Dana P Goldman
Amee Kamdar
Darius N Lakdawalla
Yang Lu
University of Southern California · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAININGT32GM007281 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CLARK, MARCUS RAMSAY · 1985 to 2022
$32.1M
USC-Yale Roybal Center for Behavioral Interventions in AgingP30AG024968 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JASON N. DOCTOR · 2004 to 2026
$14.7M
UCLA/RAND HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32HS000046 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI EISENBERG, DANIEL · 1992 to 2024
$8.7M
ECONOMICS OF TREATING VIRAL STIsR01HD054877 · NICHD · RAND CORPORATION · PI GOLDMAN, DANA P · 2009 to 2010
$985k
AHRQ HHS T32 HS 000046AHRQ HHS T32 HS000046NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024968NIA NIH HHS P30AG024968NICHD NIH HHS 1R01HD054877NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD054877NIGMS NIH HHS 5 T32 GM07281NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacologic treatments for erectile dysfunction (ED) have gained popularity among middle-aged and older men. Increased sexual activity among those who use these drugs raises concerns about sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).

objectiveTo examine the rates of STDs in men who use and do not use ED drugs.

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingDatabase of claims from 1997 to 2006 for 1,410,806 men older than age 40 years with private, employer-based insurance from 44 large companies. PATIENTS: 33,968 men with at least 1 filled prescription for an ED drug and 1,376,838 patients with no prescription. MEASUREMENTS: STD prevalence among users and nonusers of ED drugs.

resultsUsers of ED drugs had higher rates of STDs than nonusers the year before initiating ED drug therapy (214 vs. 106 annually per 100,000 persons; P = 0.003) and the year after (105 vs. 65; P = 0.004). After adjustment for age and other comorbid conditions, users of ED drugs had an odds ratio (OR) for an STD of 2.80 (95% CI, 2.10 to 3.75) in the year before initiating drug therapy; the OR was 2.65 (CI, 1.84 to 3.81) in the year after. These differences were largely due to infections with HIV. The OR for HIV infection was 3.32 (CI, 2.38 to 4.36) in the year before and 3.19 (CI, 2.11 to 4.83) in the year after an ED drug prescription was filled. Significant changes in STD rates from the year before to the year after the first ED drug prescription was filled were not documented (adjusted OR for STD for users before vs. after the first ED drug prescription was filled, 0.96 [CI, 0.87 to 1.06]). LIMITATION: Selection bias precludes conclusions about whether use of ED treatments directly leads to increases in STDs.

conclusionMen who use ED drugs have higher rates of STDs, particularly HIV infection, both in the year before and after use of these drugs. The observed association between ED drug use and STDs may have more to do with the types of patients using ED drugs rather than a direct effect of ED drug availability on STD rates. Counseling about safe sexual practices and screening for STDs should accompany the prescription of ED drugs. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: RAND Roybal Center, National Institutes of Health, and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesErectile DysfunctionHumansInsurance Claim ReviewMalePhosphodiesterase InhibitorsPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificitySexually Transmitted DiseasesUnited StatesVasodilator AgentsPhosphodiesterase InhibitorsVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID20621899
PMCPMC3673772
OpenAlexW1534391456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.