Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20620431›Full record

ReviewSeminars in hematology2010

Megakaryopoiesis.

Amy E Geddis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in hematology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The Involvement of Canonical NFκB Pathway in Megakaryocyte Differentiation Induction by Nanocurcumin.International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amy E GeddisPediatric Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92023, USA. ageddis@ucsd.edu
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY OF THROMBOPOIETINR01DK049855 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GEDDIS, AMY E, KAUSHANSKY, KENNETH · 1995 to 2013
$5.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK049855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of megakaryopoiesis and platelet production is complex, with the potential for regulation at multiple stages. Megakaryocytes are derived from the hematopoietic stem cell through successive lineage commitment steps, and they undergo a unique maturation process that includes polyploidization, development of an extensive internal demarcation membrane system, and finally formation of pro-platelet processes. Platelets are shed from these processes into vascular sinusoids within the bone marrow. Megakaryocyte differentiation is regulated both positively and negatively by transcription factors and cytokine signaling. Thrombopoietin (TPO) is the most important hematopoietic cytokine for platelet production. Clinically, acquired and inherited mutations affecting megakaryocytic transcription factors and thrombopoietin signaling have been identified in disorders of thrombocytopenia and thrombocytosis.

Indexed as

MegakaryocytesHumansSignal TransductionThrombopoietinThrombopoietin

Identifiers

PMID20620431
PMCPMC2904992
OpenAlexW4229977181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.