Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20618953›Full record

ArticleGut pathogens2010

Shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli: identification of non-O157:H7-Super-Shedding cows and related risk factors.

Andrea Menrath, Lothar H Wieler, Katrin Heidemanns, Torsten Semmler, Angelika Fruth, Nicole Kemper

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut pathogens, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Prevalence of Shiga-ToxigenicMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  4. An outbreak of Shiga toxin-producingEpidemiology and infection · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Prevalence and Implications of Shiga Toxin-ProducingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Where Did They Come from-Multi-Drug Resistant PathogenicAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Multi-Year Persistence of VerotoxigenicFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea MenrathInstitute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Christian-Albrechts-University, Hermann-Rodewald-Str, 6, 24118 Kiel, Germany. amenrath@tierzucht.uni-kiel.de.
Lothar H Wieler
Katrin Heidemanns
Torsten Semmler
Angelika Fruth
Nicole Kemper
Freie Universität Berlin · DEKiel University · DERobert Koch Institute · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShiga toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are an important cause of human gastro-enteritis and extraintestinal sequelae, with ruminants, especially cattle, as the major source of infection and reservoir. In this study, the fecal STEC shedding of 133 dairy cows was analyzed over a period of twelve months by monthly sampling with the aim to investigate shedding patterns and risk factors.

resultsOverall, 24.7% (in total 407) of 1,646 fecal samples were tested positive for stx by PCR with inner-herd prevalences on the different farms of 11.1% to 32.3%. At individual levels, cows were stx-positive on zero to eight consecutive samplings. According to a strictly longitudinal definition of Super-Shedding, in the present study 14 cows were identified as Super-Shedders of non-O157 serotypes.Significant risk factors for the shedding of STEC were the month of sampling, the number of lactations and days in lactation, the nutritional condition, the somatic cell count and the content of protein in milk. Most notably, the presence of STEC Super-Shedding cows in the herd was a significant risk factor, revealing that STEC Super-Shedding is not restricted to STEC O157:H7 alone.

conclusionsThese data have implications for possible interventions, as removing single non-O157:H7 STEC Super-Shedding cattle from farms would significantly reduce STEC burden.

Identifiers

PMID20618953
PMCPMC2917390
OpenAlexW2145783520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.