ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2010
The rheumatoid foot: a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures.
Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of tendinous foot involvement in rheumatoid arthritis.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Article
- Intervention study of a foot-care programme enhancing knowledge and practice among nurses and care workers at in-home service providers.Nursing open · 2020Article
- Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Associated with Foot and Ankle Pathologies: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- Validation of the Chinese Manchester foot pain and disability index (C-MFPDI) among patients with inflammatory arthritis.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2019Article
- Translation and Test⁻Retest of the Spanish Podiatry Health Questionnaire (PHQ-S).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- Transcultural Adaptation and Validation of the Spanish Bristol Foot Score (BFS-S).Aging and disease · 2018Article
- Adaptation and Validation of the Foot Function Index-Revised Short Form into Polish.BioMed research international · 2017Article
- The foot function index is more sensitive to change than the Leeds Foot Impact Scale for evaluating rheumatoid arthritis patients after forefoot or hindfoot reconstruction.International orthopaedics · 2016Article
- Patient-reported outcome measures in inflammatory bowel disease.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2014Review
- Comparison of the responsiveness of the foot health status questionnaire and the Manchester foot pain and disability index in older people.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2014Article
- Training the next generation of clinical researchers: evaluation of a graduate podiatrist research internship in rheumatology.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2013Article
- A review of the foot function index and the foot function index - revised.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2013Article
- The swindon foot and ankle questionnaire: is a picture worth a thousand words?ISRN rheumatology · 2012Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe foot is often the first area of the body to be systematically affected by rheumatoid arthritis. The multidimensional consequences of foot problems for patients can be subjectively evaluated using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). However, there is currently no systematic review which has focused specifically upon the PROMs available for the foot with rheumatoid arthritis. The aim of this systematic review was to appraise the foot-specific PROMs available for the assessment and/or evaluation of the foot affected with rheumatoid arthritis.
methodsA systematic search of databases was conducted according to pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. PROMs identified were reviewed in terms of: conceptual bases, quality of construction, measurement aims and evidence to support their measurement properties.
resultsA total of 11 PROMs were identified and 5 papers that provided evidence for the measurement properties of some of the PROMs. Only one of the PROMs was found to be RA disease-specific. The quality of construction, pretesting and presence of evidence for their measurement properties was found to be highly variable. Conceptual bases of many of the PROMs was either restricted or based on reductionist biomedical models. All of the PROMs were found to consist of fixed scales.
conclusionsThere is a need to develop an RA-disease and foot-specific PROM with a greater emphasis on a biopsychosocial conceptual basis, cognitive pre-testing methods, patient preference-based qualities and evidence to support the full complement of measurement properties.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.