Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20617886›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cognitive neuroscience2011

Mechanisms underlying age- and performance-related differences in working memory.

Kirk R Daffner, Hyemi Chong, Xue Sun, Elise C Tarbi, Jenna L Riis, Scott M McGinnis, Phillip J Holcomb

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06130735 (Computerized Cognitive Training), which is not on this map. Cited by 69 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06130735 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Computerized Cognitive Training: Characterization of Factors That Predict Cognitive Enhancement in Acquired Brain Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrigham and Women's HospitalRan2023 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsAcquired Brain Injury, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Mild Neurocognitive DisorderArmsCognitive Computerized Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kirk R DaffnerHarvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA. kdaffner@partners.org
Hyemi Chong
Xue Sun
Elise C Tarbi
Jenna L Riis
Scott M McGinnis
Phillip J Holcomb
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USTufts University · US

Funding

ERP Investigations of Novelty Processing in Different Patterns of Cognitive AgingR01AG017935 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI DAFFNER, KIRK R · 2002 to 2012
$4.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study took advantage of the subsecond temporal resolution of ERPs to investigate mechanisms underlying age- and performance-related differences in working memory. Young and old subjects participated in a verbal n-back task with three levels of difficulty. Each group was divided into high and low performers based on accuracy under the 2-back condition. Both old subjects and low-performing young subjects exhibited impairments in preliminary mismatch/match detection operations (indexed by the anterior N2 component). This may have undermined the quality of information available for the subsequent decision-making process (indexed by the P3 component), necessitating the appropriation of more resources. Additional anterior and right hemisphere activity was recruited by old subjects. Neural efficiency and the capacity to allocate more resources to decision-making differed between high and low performers in both age groups. Under low demand conditions, high performers executed the task utilizing fewer resources than low performers (indexed by the P3 amplitude). As task requirements increased, high-performing young and old subjects were able to appropriate additional resources to decision-making, whereas their low-performing counterparts allocated fewer resources. Higher task demands increased utilization of processing capacity for operations other than decision-making (e.g., sustained attention) that depend upon a shared pool of limited resources. As demands increased, all groups allocated additional resources to the process of sustaining attention (indexed by the posterior slow wave). Demands appeared to have exceeded capacity in low performers, leading to a reduction of resources available to the decision-making process, which likely contributed to a decline in performance.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingEvent-Related Potentials, P300FemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20617886
PMCPMC3076134
OpenAlexW2154199866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.