ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2010
Best way to revascularize patients with main stem and three-vessel lesions. Patients should be operated!
Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- TNF-α, myocardial perfusion and function in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and primary percutaneous coronary intervention.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2012Trial
- [Disappearing borders between cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery: status quo].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite established guidelines for the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) by either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), everyday clinical practice has proven to differ substantially with even the most complex coronary lesions being targeted by PCI today. However, an abundancy of clinical trials, both observational and randomized has proven the superiority of coronary surgery over PCI in almost every type of multivessel or left main CAD in symptomatic patients. This holds true also for 'hard' endpoints like cardiac death or myocardial infarction as recently demonstrated by the landmark SYNTAX trial. These results have lead to the wording of appropriateness criteria, which integrate current guidelines, evidence from clinical trials and interdisciplinary expert opinion and which express essentially the same message as the SYNTAX trial: "CABG remains the standard of care for patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease"
Indexed as
Identifiers
20617323What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.