Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20617169›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2010

Comparative analysis of DNA replication timing reveals conserved large-scale chromosomal architecture.

Eitan Yaffe, Shlomit Farkash-Amar, Andreas Polten, Zohar Yakhini, Amos Tanay, Itamar Simon

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. MLL3/MLL4 enzymatic activity shapes DNA replication timing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  13. Dynamic and broad expression of adamts9 in developing and adult zebrafish.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The evolution of the human DNA replication timing program.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Optimized Repli-seq: improved DNA replication timing analysis by next-generation sequencing.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2022
    Article
  20. Review

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eitan YaffeDepartment of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Shlomit Farkash-Amar
Andreas Polten
Zohar Yakhini
Amos Tanay
Itamar Simon

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that the timing of DNA replication is coordinated across megabase-scale domains in metazoan genomes, yet the importance of this aspect of genome organization is unclear. Here we show that replication timing is remarkably conserved between human and mouse, uncovering large regions that may have been governed by similar replication dynamics since these species have diverged. This conservation is both tissue-specific and independent of the genomic G+C content conservation. Moreover, we show that time of replication is globally conserved despite numerous large-scale genome rearrangements. We systematically identify rearrangement fusion points and demonstrate that replication time can be locally diverged at these loci. Conversely, rearrangements are shown to be correlated with early replication and physical chromosomal proximity. These results suggest that large chromosomal domains of coordinated replication are shuffled by evolution while conserving the large-scale nuclear architecture of the genome.

Indexed as

DNA Replication TimingEvolution, MolecularAnimalsCell LineChromosome MappingChromosomes, MammalianHumansMammalsMice

Identifiers

PMID20617169
PMCPMC2895651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.