Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20617046›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2010

A comparison of two motion sensors for the assessment of free-living physical activity of adolescents.

Roman Cuberek, Walid El Ansari, Karel Frömel, Krzysztof Skalik, Erik Sigmund

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Validity of Research-Grade Actigraphy Unit for Measuring Exercise Intensity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Changes in Eating Behaviours among Czech Children and Adolescents from 2002 to 2014 (HBSC Study).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Roman CuberekCenter for Kinantropology Research, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacky University in Olomouc, Czech Republic. roman.cuberek@upol.cz
Walid El Ansari
Karel Frömel
Krzysztof Skalik
Erik Sigmund
Palacký University Olomouc · CZAcademy of Fine Arts in Katowice · PLUniversity of Gloucestershire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed and compared the daily step counts recorded by two different motion sensors in order to estimate the free-living physical activity of 135 adolescent girls. Each girl concurrently wore a Yamax pedometer and an ActiGraph accelerometer (criterion measure) every day for seven consecutive days. The convergent validity of the pedometer can be considered intermediate when used to measure the step counts in free-living physical activity; but should be considered with caution when used to classify participants' step counts into corresponding physical activity categories because of a likelihood of 'erroneous' classification in comparison with the accelerometer.

Indexed as

MotionMotor ActivityAdolescentFemaleHumansaccelerometercategorization of physical activitymeasurementmonitoringpedometerstep countervalidity

Identifiers

PMID20617046
PMCPMC2872364
OpenAlexW2139480391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.