Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20616296›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM

Surveying adolescents enrolled in a regional health care delivery organization: mail and phone follow-up--what works at what cost?

Julie Richards, Cheryl Wiese, Wayne Katon, Carol Rockhill, Carolyn McCarty, David Grossman, Elizabeth McCauley, Laura P Richardson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Development and Validation of the Adolescent Assessment of Preparation for Transition: A Novel Patient Experience Measure.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Recruitment and follow-up of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: the AYA HOPE Study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julie RichardsGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. richards.je@ghc.org
Cheryl Wiese
Wayne Katon
Carol Rockhill
Carolyn McCarty
David Grossman
Elizabeth McCauley
Laura P Richardson

Funding

Population-Based Psychiatric Intervention--Primary CareK24MH069471 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KATON, WAYNE J · 2004 to 2011
$1.0M
Improve Primary Care Management of Adolescent DepressionK23MH069814 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RICHARDSON, LAURA P · 2004 to 2008
$770k
NIMH NIH HHS 1 K23MH069814NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH069814NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH069471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe the differential completion rates and cost of sequential methods for a survey of adolescents enrolled in a regional health care delivery organization.

methodsFour thousand randomly selected enrollees were invited to complete a mailed health survey. Techniques used to boost response included (1) a follow-up mailing, (2) varying the appearance of the survey, (3) reminder calls, and (4) phone calls to obtain parent and child consent and to administer the survey. We evaluated the outcome and costs of these methods.

resultsSeven hundred eighty-three enrollees (20%) completed the first mailed survey and 521 completed the second, increasing the overall response rate to 33%. Completion was significantly higher among respondents who received only the plain survey than those receiving only the color survey (P < .001). Reminder calls boosted response by 8%. Switching to administration of the survey by phone boosted response by 20% to 61%. The cost per completed survey was $29 for the first mailing, $26 after both mailings, $42 for mailings and reminder calls, and $48 for adding phone surveys.

conclusionThe response to mailings and reminder calls was low and the cost was high, with decreasing yield at each step, although some low-cost techniques were helpful. Results suggest phone surveys may be most effective among similar samples of adolescents.

Indexed as

Adolescent Health ServicesHealth SurveysAdolescentCosts and Cost AnalysisData CollectionFemaleHealth Maintenance OrganizationsHumansIdahoMaleParental ConsentPostal ServiceTelephoneWashington

Identifiers

PMID20616296
PMCPMC3191874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.