Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20616232›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2010

High-resolution analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in the mouse brain.

Christopher Gregg, Jiangwen Zhang, Brandon Weissbourd, Shujun Luo, Gary P Schroth, David Haig, Catherine Dulac

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 295 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
295citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

295 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Identification ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. The Change Rate of theBiology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

235 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christopher GreggDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. cgregg@mcb.harvard.edu
Jiangwen Zhang
Brandon Weissbourd
Shujun Luo
Gary P Schroth
David Haig
Catherine Dulac

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic imprinting results in preferential expression of the paternal or maternal allele of certain genes. We have performed a genome-wide characterization of imprinting in the mouse embryonic and adult brain. This approach uncovered parent-of-origin allelic effects of more than 1300 loci. We identified parental bias in the expression of individual genes and of specific transcript isoforms, with differences between brain regions. Many imprinted genes are expressed in neural systems associated with feeding and motivated behaviors, and parental biases preferentially target genetic pathways governing metabolism and cell adhesion. We observed a preferential maternal contribution to gene expression in the developing brain and a major paternal contribution in the adult brain. Thus, parental expression bias emerges as a major mode of epigenetic regulation in the brain.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionGenomic ImprintingAllelesAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBrainEpigenesis, GeneticFathersFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene SilencingMaleMiceMothersMultigene Family

Identifiers

PMID20616232
PMCPMC3005244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.