Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20616048›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

Reconstitution of RPA-covered single-stranded DNA-activated ATR-Chk1 signaling.

Jun-Hyuk Choi, Laura A Lindsey-Boltz, Michael Kemp, Aaron C Mason, Marc S Wold, Aziz Sancar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Fission yeast RPA-TERT-Tpz1bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. DNA Damage and Replication Stress Checkpoints.Annual review of biochemistry · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jun-Hyuk ChoiDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Laura A Lindsey-Boltz
Michael Kemp
Aaron C Mason
Marc S Wold
Aziz Sancar
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF UVRABC EXCISION NUCLEASER01GM032833 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SANCAR, AZIZ · 1985 to 2015
$8.9M
FUNCTIONAL ROLES OF CELLULAR PROTEINS IN DNA REPLICATIONR01GM044721 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI WOLD, MARC S · 1990 to 2009
$2.2M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126NIGMS NIH HHS GM32833NIGMS NIH HHS GM44721NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM032833NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM044721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ATR kinase is a critical upstream regulator of the checkpoint response to various forms of DNA damage. Previous studies have shown that ATR is recruited via its binding partner ATR-interacting protein (ATRIP) to replication protein A (RPA)-covered single-stranded DNA (RPA-ssDNA) generated at sites of DNA damage where ATR is then activated by TopBP1 to phosphorylate downstream targets including the Chk1 signal transducing kinase. However, this critical feature of the human ATR-initiated DNA damage checkpoint signaling has not been demonstrated in a defined system. Here we describe an in vitro checkpoint system in which RPA-ssDNA and TopBP1 are essential for phosphorylation of Chk1 by the purified ATR-ATRIP complex. Checkpoint defective RPA mutants fail to activate ATR kinase in this system, supporting the conclusion that this system is a faithful representation of the in vivo reaction. Interestingly, we find that an alternative form of RPA (aRPA), which does not support DNA replication, can substitute for the checkpoint function of RPA in vitro, thus revealing a potential role for aRPA in the activation of ATR kinase. We also find that TopBP1 is recruited to RPA-ssDNA in a manner dependent on ATRIP and that the N terminus of TopBP1 is required for efficient recruitment and activation of ATR kinase.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCarrier ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1DNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Repair EnzymesDNA, Single-StrandedEnzyme ActivationHeLa CellsHumansNuclear ProteinsNucleic Acid ConformationPhosphorylationProtein BindingAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATR protein, humanCarrier ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1CHEK1 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Repair EnzymesDNA, Single-StrandedNuclear ProteinsProtein KinasesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesReplication Protein ATOPBP1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID20616048
PMCPMC2922256
OpenAlexW2138521081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.