Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20615414›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular and cellular cardiology2010

Normal passive viscoelasticity but abnormal myofibrillar force generation in human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Anita C Hoskins, Adam Jacques, Sonya C Bardswell, William J McKenna, Victor Tsang, Cristobal G dos Remedios, Elisabeth Ehler, Kim Adams, Shapour Jalilzadeh, Metin Avkiran and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. CaBiophysical journal · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The Impact of Mavacamten on the Pathophysiology of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Narrative Review.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Cardiomyocyte Dysfunction in Inherited Cardiomyopathies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Anita C HoskinsCardiovascular Division, King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre, London, UK.
Adam Jacques
Sonya C Bardswell
William J McKenna
Victor Tsang
Cristobal G dos Remedios
Elisabeth Ehler
Kim Adams
Shapour Jalilzadeh
Metin Avkiran
Hugh Watkins
Charles Redwood
Steven B Marston
Jonathan C Kentish
University of Oxford · GBKing's College London · GBBritish Heart Foundation · GBImperial College London · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/07/067/23323British Heart Foundation RG/07/012/24110Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0001112Medical Research Council G0400153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is characterized by left ventricular hypertrophy, increased ventricular stiffness and impaired diastolic filling. We investigated to what extent myocardial functional defects can be explained by alterations in the passive and active properties of human cardiac myofibrils. Skinned ventricular myocytes were prepared from patients with obstructive HCM (two patients with MYBPC3 mutations, one with a MYH7 mutation, and three with no mutation in either gene) and from four donors. Passive stiffness, viscous properties, and titin isoform expression were similar in HCM myocytes and donor myocytes. Maximal Ca(2+)-activated force was much lower in HCM myocytes (14 ± 1 kN/m(2)) than in donor myocytes (23 ± 3 kN/m(2); P<0.01), though cross-bridge kinetics (k(tr)) during maximal Ca(2)(+) activation were 10% faster in HCM myocytes. Myofibrillar Ca(2)(+) sensitivity in HCM myocytes (pCa(50)=6.40 ± 0.05) was higher than for donor myocytes (pCa(50)=6.09 ± 0.02; P<0.001) and was associated with reduced phosphorylation of troponin-I (ser-23/24) and MyBP-C (ser-282) in HCM myocytes. These characteristics were common to all six HCM patients and may therefore represent a secondary consequence of the known and unknown underlying genetic variants. Some HCM patients did however exhibit an altered relationship between force and cross-bridge kinetics at submaximal Ca(2+) concentrations, which may reflect the primary mutation. We conclude that the passive viscoelastic properties of the myocytes are unlikely to account for the increased stiffness of the HCM ventricle. However, the low maximum Ca(2+)-activated force and high Ca(2+) sensitivity of the myofilaments are likely to contribute substantially to any systolic and diastolic dysfunction, respectively, in hearts of HCM patients.

Indexed as

ElasticityBiomechanical PhenomenaCalciumCardiomyopathy, HypertrophicHumansIsometric ContractionKineticsMyocytes, CardiacMyofibrilsSarcomeresStress, PhysiologicalViscosityCalcium

Identifiers

PMID20615414
PMCPMC2954357
OpenAlexW2085829694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.