ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2010
RACE to protect brains.
Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Haematomas after carotid endarterectomy can be reduced by direct pressure to the neck postoperatively.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRapid-access carotid endarterectomy (RACE) is an evidence-based treatment for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Our vascular centre aims to provide this service within 48 h of symptoms in appropriate patients. This study audits safety and efficacy of the first year of RACE. SUBJECTS AND
methodsA clear trust protocol was publicised for the RACE pathway. A prospective database was established for all carotid endarterectomies (CEAs) performed. Outcomes were compared between elective (ECE) and rapid-access operations.
resultsIn 1 year, 96 patients received CE; 20 were performed urgently. There were no significant differences in age or gender between ECE and RACE groups. Twenty-three (30%) of ECE were for asymptomatic stenoses; no other significant differences in surgical indication were seen. Of symptomatic ECE, 43% were for completed stroke versus 55% for RACE. Median delay between diagnosis and surgery was 113 days for elective and 2 days for RACE patients. There was one death following ECE (1.3%) and one stroke after RACE (5%), all not significant. Anaesthetic method did not influence outcome. The main reasons for delaying surgery in RACE patients were optimisation of patient fitness and availability of theatre time.
conclusionsThe RACE pathway dramatically reduces delay without compromising patient safety. In the first year of service, we have treated 50% of suitable patients within 48 h. Further education of patients and colleagues should reduce delay and improve outcomes for symptomatic carotid disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.