ArticleApplied spectroscopy2010
The use of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for distinguishing between bacterial pathogen species and strains.
Article in Applied spectroscopy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discriminating two bacteria via laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and artificial neural network.AMB Express · 2023Article
- The use of laser-based diagnostics for the rapid identification of infectious agents in human blood.Journal of applied microbiology · 2019Article
- Importance evaluation of spectral lines in Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for classification of pathogenic bacteria.Biomedical optics express · 2018Article
- Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS): a novel technology for identifying microbes causing infectious diseases.Biophysical reviews · 2018Review
- Detection and classification of live and dead Escherichia coli by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy.Astrobiology · 2015Article
- Rapid elemental analysis and provenance study of Blumea balsamifera DC using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014Article
- Algal biomass analysis by laser-based analytical techniques--a review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014Review
- Proof of Principle for a Real-Time Pathogen Isolation Media Diagnostic: The Use of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy to Discriminate Bacterial Pathogens and Antimicrobial-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains Grown on Blood Agar.Journal of pathogens · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) was used in a blind study to successfully differentiate bacterial pathogens, both species and strain. The pathogens used for the study were chosen and prepared by one set of researchers. The LIBS data were collected and analyzed by another set of researchers. The latter researchers had no knowledge of the sample identities other than that (1) the first five of fifteen samples were unique (not replicates) and (2) the remaining ten samples consisted of two replicates of each of the first five samples. Using only chemometric analysis of the LIBS data, the ten replicate bacterial samples were successfully matched to each of the first five samples. The results of this blind study show it is possible to differentiate the bacterial pathogens Escherichia coli, three clonal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains, and one unrelated MRSA strain using LIBS. This is an important finding because it demonstrates that LIBS can be used to determine bacterial pathogen species within a defined sample set and can be used to differentiate between clonal relationships among strains of a single multiple-antibiotic-resistant bacterial species. Such a capability is important for the development of LIBS instruments for use in medical, water, and food safety applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.