SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010
Lactulose versus Polyethylene Glycol for Chronic Constipation.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 105 papers, 21 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of a Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Based Bowel Protocol for the Management of Constipation in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Pilot Study
Efficacy of Polyethylene Glycol vs Lactulose With Isabgol in Acute Fissure-in-Ano: A Randomized Control Trial (PEGASIS Trial)
Washed Microbiota Transplantation for Chronic Constipation in Adults: a Single-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose-exploring Clinical Study
Efficacy and Safety of Lubiprostone in the Treatment of Slow Transit Constipation: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
105 citing papers in PubMed, 21 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 314 citations in OpenAlex.
- Osmotic and stimulant laxatives for the management of childhood constipation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Guideline for Medication Management of Distressing Symptoms in Older Patients Receiving End-of-Life Palliative Care.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2026Guideline
- [Seoul Consensus on Clinical Practice Guidelines for Functional Constipation].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025Guideline
- Efficacy of Probiotics Compared With Pharmacological Treatments for Maintenance Therapy for Functional Constipation in Children: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.Nutrition reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnosis and treatment of autonomic failure, pain and sleep disturbances in Parkinson's disease: guideline "Parkinson's disease" of the German Society of Neurology.Journal of neurology · 2025Guideline
- Conservative therapy versus arthroscopic surgery of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI): a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022Pooled it
- Advanced intestinal regulation improves bowel preparation quality in patients with constipation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Interventions for preventing postpartum constipation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- MASCC recommendations on the management of constipation in patients with advanced cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020Guideline
- [Irritable bowel syndrome with constipation and functional constipation in adults: Treatment (Part 2 of 2)].Atencion primaria · 2017Guideline
- Pharmacological treatment for antipsychotic-related constipation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for treatment of constipation in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- WITHDRAWN: Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for treatment of constipation in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Osmotic and stimulant laxatives for the management of childhood constipation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for treatment of constipation in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Comparison of the effectiveness of polyethylene glycol with and without electrolytes in constipation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2016Pooled it
- Interventions for preventing postpartum constipation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Laxatives for the management of constipation in people receiving palliative care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Systematic review of stimulant and nonstimulant laxatives for the treatment of functional constipation.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2014Pooled it
- Interventions for treating postpartum constipation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConstipation is a common clinical problem. Lactulose and Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) are both commonly used osmotic laxatives that have been shown to be effective and safe treatments for chronic constipation. However, there is no definitive data as to which provides the best treatment.
objectivesTo identify and review all relevant data in order to determine whether Lactulose or Polyethylene Glycol is more effective at treating chronic constipation and faecal impaction. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of lactulose and polyethylene glycol in the management of faecal impaction and chronic constipation. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies were included if they were randomised controlled trials which compared lactulose with polyethylene glycol in the management of chronic constipation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data on study methods, participants, interventions used and outcomes measured was extracted from each study. Data was entered into the Cochrane Review Manager software (RevMan 5.0) and analysed using Cochrane MetaView. MAIN
resultsIn the present meta-analysis, we considered for the first time all ten randomised controlled trials so far performed. The findings of our work indicate that Polyethylene glycol is better than lactulose in outcomes of stool frequency per week, form of stool, relief of abdominal pain and the need for additional products. On subgroup analysis, this is seen in both adults and children, except for relief of abdominal pain. AUTHORS'
conclusionsPolyethylene Glycol should be used in preference to Lactulose in the treatment of Chronic Constipation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.