Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20614459›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010

Adherence compounds in embryo transfer media for assisted reproductive technologies.

Stephan Bontekoe, Debbie Blake, Maas Jan Heineman, Eleanor C Williams, Neil Johnson

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephan BontekoeUniversity of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Debbie Blake
Maas Jan Heineman
Eleanor C Williams
Neil Johnson
Auckland University of Technology · NZUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to increase the success rate of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), adherence compounds such as hyaluronic acid and fibrin sealant have been introduced into subfertility management. Adherence compounds are added to the embryo transfer medium in order to increase the likelihood of embryo implantation, with the potential for higher clinical pregnancy and live birth rates.

objectivesTo determine whether embryo transfer media containing adherence compounds affect the live birth rate in ART compared to transfer media without adherence compounds. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO electronic databases were searched (to 26th May 2009) for publications which described randomised controlled trials of the addition of adherence compounds to embryo transfer media. Furthermore, reference lists of all obtained studies were checked and conference abstracts handsearched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only truly randomised controlled trials comparing embryo transfer media containing adherence compounds with transfer media without (or with lower doses of) adherence compounds were included. The adherence compounds that were evaluated were hyaluronic acid and fibrin sealant. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One review author selected the trials for inclusion according to the above criteria, after which two authors independently extracted the data for subsequent analysis. The statistical analysis was performed in accordance with the guidelines developed by The Cochrane Collaboration. MAIN

resultsSixteen studies with a total of 3698 participants were analysed. One studied fibrin sealant, the other 15 studied hyaluronic acid. There was no evidence of a treatment effect of fibrin sealant as an adherence compound. For hyaluronic acid, there was no evidence of a treatment effect on live birth rate. Evidence of treatment effects could be found for the clinical pregnancy rate (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.63; P < 0.00001) and the multiple pregnancy rate (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.49 to 2.31; P < 0.00001), with higher rates in the hyaluronic acid groups. No evidence of treatment effect was found for the other outcomes. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is evidence of an improved clinical pregnancy rate with the use of adherence compounds in ART cycles but no evidence of an effect on live birth rate. The increase in multiple pregnancy rate may be the result of the use of a combination of an adherence compound and a policy of transferring more than one embryo. Further studies of adherence compounds with single embryo transfer need to be undertaken.

Indexed as

Reproductive Techniques, AssistedCulture MediaEmbryo ImplantationFemaleFibrin Tissue AdhesiveHumansHyaluronic AcidLive BirthPregnancyPregnancy RateRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTissue AdhesivesCulture MediaFibrin Tissue AdhesiveHyaluronic AcidTissue Adhesives

Identifiers

PMID20614459
OpenAlexW4236494991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.