SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010
Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
117 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 904 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Influenza vaccination for healthcare workers in the UK: appraisal of systematic reviews and policy options.BMJ open · 2016Pooled it
- Seasonal influenza vaccine policy, use and effectiveness in the tropics and subtropics - a systematic literature review.Influenza and other respiratory viruses · 2016Pooled it
- A meta-analysis of intradermal versus intramuscular influenza vaccines: immunogenicity and adverse events.Influenza and other respiratory viruses · 2013Pooled it
- Comparing influenza vaccine efficacy against mismatched and matched strains: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2013Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Effectiveness and harms of seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccines in children, adults and elderly: a critical review and re-analysis of 15 meta-analyses.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2012Pooled it
- Trial
- [Use of mobile immunization teams to increase influenza vaccination coverage among heatlthcare workers. A community intervention trial].Revista espanola de salud publica · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Hygiene Behaviors Associated with Influenza-Like Illness among Adults in Beijing, China: A Large, Population-Based Survey.PloS one · 2016Trial
- Immunogenicity and safety of quadrivalent versus trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine: a randomized, controlled trial in adults.BMC infectious diseases · 2013Trial
- Trial
- A cell culture-derived influenza vaccine provides consistent protection against infection and reduces the duration and severity of disease in infected individuals.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2012Trial
- Low immunogenicity of seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine among patients receiving docetaxel for a solid tumour: results of a prospective pilot study.British journal of cancer · 2011Trial
- Immunologic non-inferiority of a newly licensed inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine versus an established vaccine: a randomized study in US adults.Human vaccines · 2011Trial
- Public health and economic benefits of seasonal influenza vaccination in risk groups in France, Italy, Spain and the UK: state of play and perspectives.BMC public health · 2024Article
57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDifferent types of influenza vaccines are currently produced worldwide. Healthy adults are presently targeted mainly in North America.
objectivesIdentify, retrieve and assess all studies evaluating the effects of vaccines against influenza in healthy adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, 2010, issue 2), MEDLINE (January 1966 to June 2010) and EMBASE (1990 to June 2010). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs comparing influenza vaccines with placebo or no intervention in naturally-occurring influenza in healthy individuals aged 16 to 65 years. We also included comparative studies assessing serious and rare harms. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN
resultsWe included 50 reports. Forty (59 sub-studies) were clinical trials of over 70,000 people. Eight were comparative non-RCTs and assessed serious harms. Two were reports of harms which could not be introduced in the data analysis. In the relatively uncommon circumstance of vaccine matching the viral circulating strain and high circulation, 4% of unvaccinated people versus 1% of vaccinated people developed influenza symptoms (risk difference (RD) 3%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2% to 5%). The corresponding figures for poor vaccine matching were 2% and 1% (RD 1, 95% CI 0% to 3%). These differences were not likely to be due to chance. Vaccination had a modest effect on time off work and had no effect on hospital admissions or complication rates. Inactivated vaccines caused local harms and an estimated 1.6 additional cases of Guillain-Barré Syndrome per million vaccinations. The harms evidence base is limited. AUTHORS'
conclusionsInfluenza vaccines have a modest effect in reducing influenza symptoms and working days lost. There is no evidence that they affect complications, such as pneumonia, or transmission.WARNING: This review includes 15 out of 36 trials funded by industry (four had no funding declaration). An earlier systematic review of 274 influenza vaccine studies published up to 2007 found industry funded studies were published in more prestigious journals and cited more than other studies independently from methodological quality and size. Studies funded from public sources were significantly less likely to report conclusions favorable to the vaccines. The review showed that reliable evidence on influenza vaccines is thin but there is evidence of widespread manipulation of conclusions and spurious notoriety of the studies. The content and conclusions of this review should be interpreted in light of this finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.