Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20614421›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010

Prophylactic intravenous indomethacin for preventing mortality and morbidity in preterm infants.

Peter W Fowlie, Peter G Davis, William McGuire

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06064825 (Long Term Follow-up of the TREOCAPA), which is not on this map. Cited by 110 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
26.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06064825 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Long Term Follow-up of the TREOCAPA (Prophylactic TREatment Of the duCtus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants by Acetaminophen) Study (TREOCAPA-LT)

TypeobservationalSponsorInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, FranceRan2023 to 2027Enrolled500ConditionsPatency of the Ductus Arteriosus Acetaminophen Extreme PrematurityArms2 year follow-up of neurodevelopment using a parental questionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 481 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Indomethacin for symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Intraventricular hemorrhage and posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus in preterm infants: diagnosis, classification, and treatment options.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2019
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter W FowlieWomen & Child Health, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK, DD1 9SY.
Peter G Davis
William McGuire
Ninewells Hospital · GBRoyal Women's Hospital · AUUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersistent patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is associated with mortality and morbidity in preterm infants. Prostaglandin synthetase inhibitors such as indomethacin promote PDA closure but also have potential side effects. The effect of the prophylactic use of indomethacin, where infants who may not have gone on to develop a symptomatic PDA would be exposed to indomethacin, warrants particular scrutiny.

objectivesTo determine the effect of prophylactic indomethacin on mortality and morbidity in preterm infants. SEARCH STRATEGY: The standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group was used. This included searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 5, 2010), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL (until April 2010), conference proceedings, and previous reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared prophylactic indomethacin versus placebo or no drug in preterm infants. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group were used, with separate evaluation of trial quality and data extraction by two review authors. MAIN

resultsNineteen eligible trials in which 2872 infants participated were identified. Most participants were very low birth weight, but the largest single trial restricted participation to extremely low birth weight infants (N = 1202). The trials were generally of good quality.The incidence of symptomatic PDA [typical relative risk (RR) 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38 to 0.50] and PDA surgical ligation (typical RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.37,0.71) was significantly lower in treated infants. Prophylactic indomethacin also significantly reduced the incidence of severe intraventricular haemorrhage (typical RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.82). Meta-analyses found no evidence of an effect on mortality (typical RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.12) or on a composite of death or severe neurodevelopmental disability assessed at 18 to 36 months old (typical RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.90, 1.15). AUTHORS'

conclusionsProphylactic indomethacin has short-term benefits for preterm infants including a reduction in the incidence of symptomatic PDA, PDA surgical ligation, and severe intraventricular haemorrhage. However, there is no evidence of effect on mortality or neurodevelopment.

Indexed as

Infant, Very Low Birth WeightCardiovascular AgentsCerebral HemorrhageDuctus Arteriosus, PatentHumansIndomethacinInfant, Extremely Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornInfant, Premature, DiseasesInjections, IntravenousRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCardiovascular AgentsIndomethacin

Identifiers

PMID20614421
PMCPMC7045285
OpenAlexW1578545245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.