ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2010
Manometry data support a novel concept of the lower esophageal sphincter system.
Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Stretch sphincter of the esophagus : Paradoxical sphincter with angiomyoelastic architecture].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2015Review
- Article
- Ninety and still active in research.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDetailed understanding of the functional anatomy of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) is germane to successful surgical treatment of esophageal disorders. However, a comprehensive concept of the structure-function relationship of the LES is currently lacking.
methodsWe reviewed published anatomic evidence, medical imaging, and impedance manometry data sets and developed a novel functional concept of the LES.
resultsMorphologic evidence accumulated over the past three decades indicates that the LES is an anatomic structure that differs markedly from typical ring sphincters of the gastrointestinal tract (e.g., upper esophageal sphincter or anal sphincters). Recent impedance manometry investigations shed new light on the functional anatomy of the LES. These data corroborate a concept of this sphincter as a double-layer, twisted stretch sphincter. This sphincter requires tissue tension for optimal function. Retightening of the longitudinal stretch of the esophagus provides an effective therapy if this tension is lost, e.g., for patients with hiatal hernias. Paralysis of the muscle fibers of this sphincter system results in functional obstruction, and this explains the pathophysiology of "achalasia".
conclusionsBased on available data, we propose a novel concept that better explains the structure-function relationship of the LES. Improved knowledge of the biomechanical factors of esophageal disorders can be expected to advance surgical treatment for these diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.