Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20614022›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Identification of inappropriately reprogrammed genes by large-scale transcriptome analysis of individual cloned mouse blastocysts.

Atsushi Fukuda, Feng Cao, Shinnosuke Morita, Kaori Yamada, Yuko Jincho, Shouji Tane, Yusuke Sotomaru, Tomohiro Kono

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Manipulating the Epigenome in Nuclear Transfer Cloning: Where, When and How.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Totipotency: what it is and what it is not.Stem cells and development · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Recent advancements in cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. More with less Xist.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Atsushi FukudaDepartment of Bioscience, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo, Japan.
Feng Cao
Shinnosuke Morita
Kaori Yamada
Yuko Jincho
Shouji Tane
Yusuke Sotomaru
Tomohiro Kono
Tokyo University of Agriculture · JPHiroshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although cloned embryos generated by somatic/embryonic stem cell nuclear transfer (SECNT) certainly give rise to viable individuals, they can often undergo embryonic arrest at any stage of embryogenesis, leading to diverse morphological abnormalities. In an effort to gain further insights into reprogramming and the properties of SECNT embryos, we performed a large-scale gene expression profiling of 87 single blastocysts using GeneChip microarrays. Sertoli cells, cumulus cells, and embryonic stem cells were used as donor cells. The gene expression profiles of 87 blastocysts were subjected to microarray analysis. Using principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering, the gene expression profiles were clearly classified into 3 clusters corresponding to the type of donor cell. The results revealed that each type of SECNT embryo had a unique gene expression profile that was strictly dependent upon the type of donor cells, although there was considerable variation among the individual profiles within each group. This suggests that the reprogramming process is distinct for embryos cloned from different types of donor cells. Furthermore, on the basis of the results of comparison analysis, we identified 35 genes that were inappropriately reprogrammed in most of the SECNT embryos; our findings demonstrated that some of these genes, such as Asz1, Xlr3a and App, were appropriately reprogrammed only in the embryos with a transcriptional profile that was the closest to that of the controls. Our findings provide a framework to further understand the reprogramming in SECNT embryos.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAnimalsBlastocystCloning, OrganismDown-RegulationMiceOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPolymerase Chain ReactionUp-Regulation

Identifiers

PMID20614022
PMCPMC2894852
OpenAlexW1978634130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.