Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20613934›Full record

ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2010

Norepinephrine remains increased in the six-minute walking test after heart transplantation.

Guilherme Veiga Guimarães, Veridiana D'Avila, Edimar Alcides Bocchi, Vitor Oliveira Carvalho

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Guilherme Veiga GuimarãesInstituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil. gvguima@usp.br
Veridiana D'Avila
Edimar Alcides Bocchi
Vitor Oliveira Carvalho
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRInstituto do Coração · PTUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe sought to evaluate the neurohormonal activity in heart transplant recipients and compare it with that in heart failure patients and healthy subjects during rest and just after a 6-minute walking test.

introductionDespite the improvements in quality of life and survival provided by heart transplantation, the neurohormonal profile is poorly described.

methodsTwenty heart transplantation (18 men, 49+/-11 years and 8.5+/-3.3 years after transplantation), 11 heart failure (8 men, 43+/-10 years), and 7 healthy subjects (5 men 39+/-8 years) were included in this study. Blood samples were collected immediately before and during the last minute of the exercise.

resultsDuring rest, patients' norepinephrine plasma level (659+/-225 pg/mL) was higher in heart transplant recipients (463+/-167 pg/mL) and healthy subjects (512+/-132), p<0.05. Heart transplant recipient's norepinephrine plasma level was not different than that of healthy subjects. Just after the 6-minute walking test, the heart transplant recipient's norepinephrine plasma level (1248+/-692 pg/mL) was not different from that of heart failure patients (1174+/-653 pg/mL). Both these groups had a higher level than healthy subjects had (545+/-95 pg/mL), p<0.05.

conclusionNeurohormonal activity remains increased after the 6-minute walking test after heart transplantation.

Indexed as

Exercise TestAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHeart FailureHeart TransplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorepinephrineWalkingNorepinephrine6-minute walking testCardiac rehabilitationExerciseHeart failureHeart transplantationNorepinephrine

Identifiers

PMID20613934
PMCPMC2898555
OpenAlexW2044361960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.