ArticlePloS one2010
The impact of CpG island on defining transcriptional activation of the mouse L1 retrotransposable elements.
Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early maternal care restores LINE-1 methylation and enhances neurodevelopment in preterm infants.BMC medicine · 2021Trial
- YY1 is a transcriptional activator of the mouse LINE-1 Tf subfamily.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- YY1 is a transcriptional activator of mouse LINE-1 Tf subfamily.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- YY1-dependent transcriptional regulation manifests at the morula stage.microPublication biology · 2024Article
- Locus-resolution analysis of L1 regulation and retrotransposition potential in mouse embryonic development.Genome research · 2023Article
- Review
- Analysis of epigenetic features characteristic of L1 loci expressed in human cells.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Gestational arsenic exposure induces site-specific DNA hypomethylation in active retrotransposon subfamilies in offspring sperm in mice.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2020Article
- Restricting retrotransposons: a review.Mobile DNA · 2016Review
- LINE-1 retrotransposons: from 'parasite' sequences to functional elements.Journal of applied genetics · 2015Article
- Novel Human Embryonic Stem Cell Regulators Identified by Conserved and Distinct CpG Island Methylation State.PloS one · 2015Article
- Defending the genome from the enemy within: mechanisms of retrotransposon suppression in the mouse germline.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2014Review
- Importance of the matriline for genomic imprinting, brain development and behaviour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013Review
- Article
- A downstream CpG island controls transcript initiation and elongation and the methylation state of the imprinted Airn macro ncRNA promoter.PLoS genetics · 2012Article
- Retrofitting the genome: L1 extinction follows endogenous retroviral expansion in a group of muroid rodents.Journal of virology · 2011Article
- Sperm methylation profiles reveal features of epigenetic inheritance and evolution in primates.Cell · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundL1 retrotransposable elements are potent insertional mutagens responsible for the generation of genomic variation and diversification of mammalian genomes, but reliable estimates of the numbers of actively transposing L1 elements are mostly nonexistent. While the human and mouse genomes contain comparable numbers of L1 elements, several phylogenetic and L1Xplore analyses in the mouse genome suggest that 1,500-3,000 active L1 elements currently exist and that they are still expanding in the genome. Conversely, the human genome contains only 150 active L1 elements. In addition, there is a discrepancy among the nature and number of mouse L1 elements in L1Xplore and the mouse genome browser at the UCSC and in the literature. To date, the reason why a high copy number of active L1 elements exist in the mouse genome but not in the human genome is unknown, as are the potential mechanisms that are responsible for transcriptional activation of mouse L1 elements. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsWe analyzed the promoter sequences of the 1,501 potentially active mouse L1 elements retrieved from the GenBank and L1Xplore databases and evaluated their transcription factors binding sites and CpG content. To this end, we found that a substantial number of mouse L1 elements contain altered transcription factor YY1 binding sites on their promoter sequences that are required for transcriptional initiation, suggesting that only a half of L1 elements are capable of being transcriptionally active. Furthermore, we present experimental evidence that previously unreported CpG islands exist in the promoters of the most active T(F) family of mouse L1 elements. The presence of sequence variations and polymorphisms in CpG islands of L1 promoters that arise from transition mutations indicates that CpG methylation could play a significant role in determining the activity of L1 elements in the mouse genome.
conclusionsA comprehensive analysis of mouse L1 promoters suggests that the number of transcriptionally active elements is significantly lower than the total number of full-length copies from the three active mouse L1 families. Like human L1 elements, the CpG islands and potentially the transcription factor YY1 binding sites are likely to be required for transcriptional initiation of mouse L1 elements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.