Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20613665›Full record

SynthesisMedical care2010

Quality improvement implementation and disparities: the case of the health disparities collaboratives.

Marshall H Chin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical care, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01087073 (Improving Diabetes Care and Outcomes on the South Side of Chicago), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01087073 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Diabetes Care and Outcomes on the South Side of Chicago

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ChicagoRan2009 to 2016Enrolled6,209ConditionsDiabetes MellitusArmsPatient Activation, Provider Training, Quality Improvement, Community Outreach
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Marshall H ChinSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. mchin@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu

Funding

TRANSGENIC COREP60DK020595 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BELL, GRAEME I · 1985 to 2012
$25.5M
Research and Mentorship in Improving Diabetes CareK24DK071933 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CHIN, MARSHALL H · 2005 to 2014
$1.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK071933NIDDK NIH HHS P60 DK020595NIDDK NIH HHS P60 DK20595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Health Disparities Collaboratives (HDCs), a quality improvement (QI) collaborative incorporating rapid QI, a chronic care model, and learning sessions, have been implemented in over 900 community health centers across the country.

objectivesTo determine the HDC's effect on clinical processes and outcomes, their financial impact, and factors important for successful implementation. RESEARCH

designSystematic review of the literature.

resultsThe HDCs improve clinical processes of care over short-term period of 1 to 2 years, and clinical processes and outcomes over longer period of 2 to 4 years. Most participants perceive that the HDCs are successful and worth the effort. Analysis of the Diabetes Collaborative reveals that it is societally cost-effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $33,386 per quality-adjusted life year, but that consistent revenue streams for the initiative do not exist. Common barriers to improvement include lack of resources, time, and staff burnout. Highest ranked priorities for more funding are money for direct patient services, data entry, and staff time for QI. Other common requests for more assistance are help with patient self-management, information systems, and getting providers to follow guidelines. Relatively low-cost ways to increase staff morale and prevent burnout include personal recognition, skills development opportunities, and fair distribution of work.

conclusionsThe HDCs have successfully improved quality of care, and the Diabetes Collaborative is societally cost-effective, but policy reforms are necessary to create a sustainable business case for these health centers that serve many uninsured and underinsured populations.

Indexed as

Community Health CentersCommunity NetworksHealth Status DisparitiesChronic DiseaseCost-Benefit AnalysisDiabetes MellitusHealth Plan ImplementationHumansOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareTotal Quality Management

Identifiers

PMID20613665
PMCPMC3401560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.